Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
778 messages
:
Starting
Fri Sep 01 2006 - 05:53:45 CEST,
Ending
Sat Sep 30 2006 - 22:33:38 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
paul c
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 05:53:45 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
vc
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:01 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 16:23:14 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 17:42:49 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 21:43:45 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
vc
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 18:39:26 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Sat Sep 02 2006 - 07:42:40 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
(Sat Sep 02 2006 - 17:00:47 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
David Cressey
(Sat Sep 02 2006 - 13:41:04 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
David Cressey
(Sat Sep 02 2006 - 13:55:57 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Sat Sep 02 2006 - 21:34:13 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
(Sun Sep 03 2006 - 12:55:41 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
Alexandr Savinov
(Sun Sep 03 2006 - 13:31:15 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
Johan Sjöström
(Sun Sep 03 2006 - 20:32:22 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Sun Sep 03 2006 - 19:38:01 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
(Sun Sep 03 2006 - 22:08:12 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Sampo Syreeni
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 15:12:25 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Jonathan Leffler
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 07:28:31 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 10:35:14 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 13:50:41 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 10:28:23 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 14:22:36 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 16:38:27 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 17:35:52 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Marshall
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 21:43:22 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 23:06:55 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 15:03:42 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 10:38:56 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Keith H Duggar
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 18:52:39 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 12:46:27 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Marshall
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 20:04:45 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
J M Davitt
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 04:35:38 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Marshall
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 21:11:40 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Marshall
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 21:37:16 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 23:11:34 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 02:02:14 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 13:58:36 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 23:50:23 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
J M Davitt
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 04:38:28 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 06:23:15 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Cimode
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 11:07:20 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
Cimode
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 11:21:25 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
David Cressey
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 14:19:12 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 16:06:32 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
erk
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 18:36:53 CEST)
Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
-CELKO-
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 18:49:16 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
David Cressey
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 21:34:13 CEST)
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
mAsterdam
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 00:14:23 CEST)
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
Cimode
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 09:43:04 CEST)
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 16:12:57 CEST)
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 16:20:25 CEST)
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 18:36:47 CEST)
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
Cimode
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 16:57:48 CEST)
cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
mAsterdam
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 22:39:51 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 10:09:54 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 10:25:44 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 10:37:29 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 11:06:00 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 11:51:29 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 12:43:45 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 14:16:23 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 15:34:39 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 16:12:43 CEST)
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 16:39:24 CEST)
Re: Book advertising
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 17:24:27 CEST)
Re: Book advertising
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 17:34:03 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 08:51:19 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Cimode
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 09:37:17 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 16:47:11 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Marshall
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 23:47:07 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 00:41:04 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Marshall
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 06:16:30 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 09:55:52 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Tue Sep 05 2006 - 23:36:41 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 07:11:27 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 10:54:24 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
vc
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 15:04:45 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 21:25:19 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
vc
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 23:58:54 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 15:08:08 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 15:36:35 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 16:06:42 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 16:53:39 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 06 2006 - 22:29:10 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 01:25:35 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 18:40:04 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 08:47:51 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 11:49:32 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 11:13:14 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 00:28:16 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 11:16:06 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 02:10:39 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 02:54:45 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 02:30:09 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 02:43:42 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 10:02:07 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 10:15:29 CEST)
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 12:54:56 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 11:59:33 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 12:24:42 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 13:19:46 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 08:14:00 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 20:15:32 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 23:11:22 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 21:55:09 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Dan
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 07:31:24 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 15:06:58 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 16:03:20 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 09:55:42 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 14:16:35 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Alexandr Savinov
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 15:01:18 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 15:43:48 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Alexandr Savinov
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 16:02:45 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 16:29:19 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 16:35:53 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 14:56:27 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 16:57:48 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Johnny
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 23:33:16 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 00:28:52 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 22:10:01 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 23:45:47 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 21:58:29 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 00:16:33 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 21:56:21 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 23:03:18 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Roy Hann
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 13:21:44 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 13:55:45 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 15:27:11 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 15:44:25 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Evan Keel
(Sat Sep 09 2006 - 00:34:18 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 09 2006 - 04:33:08 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Alexandr Savinov
(Sat Sep 09 2006 - 12:27:01 CEST)
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Keith H Duggar
(Sun Sep 10 2006 - 05:59:59 CEST)
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Frank Hamersley
(Sun Sep 10 2006 - 08:57:53 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Evan Keel
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 01:37:26 CEST)
Re: I have no blog
Evan Keel
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 01:44:00 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 17:47:05 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 18:45:01 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 01:38:32 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 21:02:28 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 22:09:36 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Paul
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 20:24:56 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 20:36:28 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 20:48:24 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 01:16:53 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 21:19:49 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 11 2006 - 22:06:09 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 23:20:16 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Paul
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 20:32:56 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 20:59:41 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Alexandr Savinov
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 10:46:56 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 12:40:34 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Damien
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 14:35:48 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 14:47:29 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Alexandr Savinov
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 15:13:11 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 21:26:44 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Paul
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 20:42:26 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 21:42:24 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 02:05:34 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 03:17:17 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 23:06:37 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 15:30:47 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 21:44:19 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 02:29:11 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 14:08:03 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 16:11:03 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 19:22:54 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 19:56:59 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 20:43:43 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 21:38:14 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 22:10:32 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 23:42:02 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 00:00:57 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
CMCC
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 21:50:11 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 19:03:42 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 21:58:32 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 23:48:10 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 01:59:33 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 20:16:34 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 02:21:17 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 20:24:26 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 20:28:19 CEST)
Two relations with the same attributes (was: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?)
mAsterdam
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 09:06:19 CEST)
Re: Two relations with the same attributes (was: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?)
Cimode
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 19:52:53 CEST)
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
mAsterdam
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:08:21 CEST)
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
JOG
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:33:02 CEST)
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
Cimode
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:11:29 CEST)
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
mAsterdam
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 00:43:06 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 17:21:39 CEST)
Re: I have no blog
Larry Coon
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 17:49:09 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Johnny
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 02:07:24 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 02:28:24 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 22:01:06 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 23:07:51 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 14:36:18 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 00:27:33 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 21:58:51 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 02:37:08 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 02:53:58 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 21:47:43 CEST)
Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 10:54:44 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
FreeData
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 14:28:55 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 14:59:02 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 16:59:12 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 10:55:12 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 12:00:05 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 12:25:44 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 14:35:06 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 03:17:09 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 05:21:05 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 12:24:41 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 12:17:06 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:15:25 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:36:39 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 18:37:44 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 22:00:53 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 22:21:03 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 23:50:41 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 00:40:37 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 10:26:42 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: Steps towards a unified method
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 12:44:33 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 19:20:55 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 20:03:12 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 21:28:15 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 22:17:25 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 23:46:13 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 23:59:41 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 03:30:43 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 09:27:25 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:11:38 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 20:14:42 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 00:15:30 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 01:54:32 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 02:38:45 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:36:38 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 09:14:04 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 22:38:44 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 23:54:11 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 12:52:19 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 13:58:25 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 14:36:37 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 12:43:13 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 15:43:29 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 17:21:40 CEST)
Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 20:56:31 CEST)
Re: Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 22:23:06 CEST)
Re: Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Cimode
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 11:49:57 CEST)
Re: Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 12:27:56 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
David Cressey
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 16:18:16 CEST)
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:45:22 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Paul
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 21:55:06 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 22:10:06 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 22:25:28 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 10:07:39 CEST)
Re: I have no blog
Evan Keel
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 00:26:21 CEST)
Re: I have no blog
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 00:45:11 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 02:30:09 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
J M Davitt
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 05:21:17 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 04:09:34 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
J M Davitt
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 05:54:55 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 03:05:36 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 06:07:56 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
J M Davitt
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 14:45:46 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
Rob
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 17:39:11 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 18:27:03 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
dawn
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 23:56:29 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
dawn
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 23:52:11 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
Johnny
(Fri Sep 15 2006 - 22:19:27 CEST)
Re: Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
David Cressey
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 02:25:34 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
JOG
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 03:25:33 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
paul c
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 16:43:16 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
paul c
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:13:26 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
JOG
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:39:21 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
paul c
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 15:23:32 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
dawn
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:24:36 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Keith H Duggar
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 03:34:19 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 22:14:34 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 00:20:31 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Brian Selzer
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 02:50:25 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Brian Selzer
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 03:13:49 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
David Cressey
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 15:38:22 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 19:07:57 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 20:43:57 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 23:43:00 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:15:53 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:40:28 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 02:31:54 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 02:24:10 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 13:44:04 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 18:51:02 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 13:48:35 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 16:53:14 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 00:02:12 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 18:15:28 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 21:16:55 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Frank Hamersley
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 02:47:29 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 21:32:35 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:58:30 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:23:49 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:41:07 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:56:22 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:06:09 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:05:51 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:16:56 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 04:59:11 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 05:23:50 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 20:45:43 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:52:15 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 05:00:55 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 05:25:32 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 20:46:05 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 12:12:27 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 14:21:57 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:55:43 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:04:15 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 13:19:12 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 14:16:14 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 15:28:54 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 16:01:10 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 21:11:47 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 23:17:32 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 11:57:29 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 20:35:50 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 01:27:42 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 11:14:12 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:26:18 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 10:19:09 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 15:19:43 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 15:34:18 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:40:58 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
J M Davitt
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:49:58 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 21:38:00 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:54:10 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:16:46 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:22:45 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:58:17 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:22:55 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
-CELKO-
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 04:14:59 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 09:03:07 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 01:57:11 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:30:38 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 19:47:56 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 19:43:48 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
J M Davitt
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 02:00:30 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 08:57:19 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
JOG
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 03:21:32 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:39:34 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 09:17:16 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 10:04:08 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 10:37:43 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Johnny
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 05:00:04 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:46:48 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 08:59:37 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 09:38:02 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 16:47:05 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
J M Davitt
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:53:46 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jonathan Leffler
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 09:10:11 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 10:03:22 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 10:41:29 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:42:24 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:54:59 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 12:22:04 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 13:47:15 CEST)
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 14:00:00 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 09:51:32 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 10:32:56 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:00:58 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:28:41 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 10:51:38 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Sampo Syreeni
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 10:53:51 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 10:56:03 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
-CELKO-
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 16:31:17 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 17:39:57 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 12:05:08 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 16:39:17 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 14:18:23 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 21:37:18 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:37:53 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 01:06:32 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 02:41:56 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 21:50:22 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 11:17:51 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 00:07:33 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:01:00 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:41:40 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 05:05:22 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 05:26:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 05:55:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 06:08:12 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 06:19:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:11:21 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 14:44:10 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 15:11:50 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:30:41 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:03:50 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 00:17:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 01:42:03 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 03:24:32 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 03:46:11 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 04:25:00 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 04:34:55 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 04:56:36 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 18:16:58 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
paul c
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 23:59:40 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 01:17:15 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
paul c
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:32:29 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:37:26 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:02:48 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:11:19 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:12:26 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:30:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 04:38:52 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 06:18:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 09:37:12 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 10:54:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 14:26:44 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 22:32:25 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:22:02 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:16:21 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:24:45 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:43:03 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:51:06 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 20:00:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 20:17:41 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 20:21:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 21:34:31 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 22:30:29 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 20:24:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? -OT break
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 23:50:39 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 14:29:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 14:47:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 20:40:37 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:53:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 14:51:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 15:11:39 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 07:51:52 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and Projection
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 11:26:08 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and Projection
David Cressey
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 14:25:34 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and Projection
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 15:02:50 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and Projection
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 15:54:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and Projection
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 16:13:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 17:39:49 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 23:40:41 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 01:40:59 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:09:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 03:13:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 05:54:12 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:03:03 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:44:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 13:28:59 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:15:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:20:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 08:43:24 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:14:02 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:23:51 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:19:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 09:43:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:40:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:46:16 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 14:46:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:52:14 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:36:34 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:10:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:53:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:45:29 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:09:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:04:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:27:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:23:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:43:32 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:52:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 19:49:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 19:04:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 19:29:49 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 20:34:16 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 20:50:25 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 11:12:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 17:00:51 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 17:29:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:22:29 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:41:42 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 20:46:10 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 02:18:37 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 02:43:51 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 17:59:30 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 17:05:29 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 17:34:06 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Rick Decker
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 02:52:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 03:01:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 11:50:52 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 10:32:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 11:42:40 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 12:01:58 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 20:42:22 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 23:37:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 01:58:38 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 03:50:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 16:54:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 17:54:43 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vadimtro_at_gmail.com
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 02:33:39 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 11:04:49 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:36:20 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 10:26:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 22:20:02 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:16:14 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:22:51 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Brian Selzer
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 06:02:13 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 16:08:11 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 17:53:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:46:25 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 03:37:24 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 07:52:10 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 11:34:19 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 18:08:06 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 18:54:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 18:58:21 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:49:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 18:41:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 10:17:39 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 04:10:46 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 14:36:28 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 15:05:40 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 15:36:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 17:41:30 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 18:13:21 CEST)
Empty Names (was: Idempotence ad nauseum)
Marshall
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 18:45:29 CEST)
Re: Empty Names
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 19:25:29 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 00:29:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 00:49:25 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 15:35:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 15:44:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 18:50:19 CEST)
Re: Using the same FK in a table more then once
-CELKO-
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 17:21:35 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 17:23:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 18:56:43 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:09:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:05:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 20:45:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 21:07:49 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 19:50:24 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 20:16:43 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 21:18:41 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 21:33:50 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 22:16:56 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 22:01:20 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 23:03:10 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? -OT break
HansF
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 01:17:28 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 07:58:16 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 12:03:19 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 15:32:45 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 16:34:14 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 18:01:20 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 19:08:53 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 20:50:32 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 20:14:25 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 21:24:31 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 23:10:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 01:39:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 04:36:12 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 05:13:24 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 05:47:38 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 06:54:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 12:59:45 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 13:20:59 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 15:29:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 16:06:27 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 17:19:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 17:45:44 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 18:48:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 19:48:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 21:06:10 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 21:18:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 21:42:06 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 22:12:48 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 02:09:03 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 11:42:50 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 14:52:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 16:10:38 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 17:18:20 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 17:34:09 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 17:56:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 18:28:36 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 19:09:35 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 19:36:27 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 20:21:37 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 21:31:36 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 21:48:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 22:08:21 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 05:31:14 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 06:24:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 08:40:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 22:16:56 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 15:38:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 16:45:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 17:34:06 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 18:39:23 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 06:36:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 10:26:00 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 01:17:18 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 01:49:13 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 11:09:30 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 13:26:42 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 08:59:21 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 09:58:58 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 09:20:17 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 13:38:37 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 09:41:03 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 13:31:12 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 12:16:03 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 14:49:37 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 15:37:10 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 15:11:45 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 15:41:56 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 15:48:09 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 15:49:06 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 16:05:31 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 19:46:51 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 21:20:57 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 20:02:17 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 09:56:06 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 20:27:32 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 21:36:14 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
David Cressey
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 14:31:22 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 10:59:23 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 12:00:05 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 12:42:26 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 12:53:48 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Marshall
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 18:13:26 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
vldm10
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 20:23:18 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 20:54:15 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
JOG
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 15:48:24 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Brian Selzer
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 10:07:13 CEST)
Re: re:updatableViews
Cimode
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 10:22:59 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
David Cressey
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 14:05:39 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 17:21:38 CEST)
Re: updatableViews
Rick Elbers
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 18:14:12 CEST)
Re: updatableViews
paul c
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 01:09:19 CEST)
Re: updatableViews
Cimode
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 11:07:08 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
vldm10
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 18:22:27 CEST)
Re: re:updatableViews
Lennart
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 22:10:03 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
David Portas
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 00:31:10 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 01:40:11 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Jonathan Leffler
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 05:53:49 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
David Cressey
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 14:19:07 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
David Cressey
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 14:20:49 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Cimode
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 14:22:38 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Volker Hetzer
(Thu Sep 28 2006 - 19:33:51 CEST)
Re: updatableViews
Rick Elbers
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 00:04:02 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Karen Hill
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 00:09:13 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 01:09:25 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
paul c
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 01:27:50 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
paul c
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 01:35:33 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 02:13:44 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
paul c
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 04:26:29 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Bob Badour
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 04:30:22 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
frosty
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 05:48:45 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
David Cressey
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 15:14:13 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
JOG
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 16:12:39 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Brian Selzer
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 19:08:06 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
David Portas
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 19:45:03 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
JOG
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 22:33:38 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Roy Hann
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 22:20:05 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
erk
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 17:37:02 CEST)
Order details table reference live data
Johan Sjöström
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 17:43:58 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 18:39:59 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
Johan Sjöström
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 21:07:17 CEST)
Re: Order details table reference live data
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 01 2006 - 23:07:02 CEST)
Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 03 2006 - 23:25:41 CEST)
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 03 2006 - 23:38:57 CEST)
Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
mrettig
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 02:47:47 CEST)
Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 04 2006 - 11:40:04 CEST)
abstraction of table relationships
Marshall
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 06:57:52 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Alexandr Savinov
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 11:34:21 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 11:56:36 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Dan
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 15:58:22 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 12:44:42 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 15:53:16 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
JOG
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 19:25:48 CEST)
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 21:12:44 CEST)
TSD 2006 Last Call for Participation
TSD 2006
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 13:15:40 CEST)
On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 16:35:38 CEST)
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
David Cressey
(Thu Sep 07 2006 - 23:42:25 CEST)
Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Faisal
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 04:13:31 CEST)
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 04:38:18 CEST)
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Marshall
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 07:39:31 CEST)
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Roy Hann
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 10:34:43 CEST)
3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Karen Hill
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 21:05:15 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
frosty
(Fri Sep 08 2006 - 21:49:37 CEST)
I have no blog
-CELKO-
(Sun Sep 10 2006 - 04:28:55 CEST)
DW/Kimball Method Consultant recommendations
littldo_at_yahoo.com
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 17:53:14 CEST)
Re: DW/Kimball Method Consultant recommendations
FreeData
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 23:36:04 CEST)
CFP: IADIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE APPLIED COMPUTING 2007
natty2006_at_gmail.com
(Tue Sep 12 2006 - 18:28:46 CEST)
Nested structures
dawn
(Wed Sep 13 2006 - 04:57:02 CEST)
Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 09:10:02 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
(Thu Sep 14 2006 - 18:34:21 CEST)
Columns without names
JOG
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 04:00:47 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
David Cressey
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 13:36:56 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 14:58:59 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
paul c
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:05:11 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
paul c
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 16:50:31 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 18:16:52 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:25:38 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 18:13:24 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
dawn
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:44:59 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
dawn
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 19:35:19 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
David Cressey
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 16:04:22 CEST)
Download the JAVA , .NET and SQL Server interview PDF
Jobs
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 15:14:08 CEST)
Re: Download the JAVA , .NET and SQL Server interview PDF
Bob Badour
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 19:01:11 CEST)
Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Roy Hann
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 11:18:01 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 13:20:58 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 15:15:22 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:00:50 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
-CELKO-
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:55:36 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Roy Hann
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 17:38:20 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:16:53 CEST)
Office Networking
thejackal51
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 16:35:53 CEST)
Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 20:57:27 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 04:55:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 05:43:31 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 05:25:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:15:34 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:21:43 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:43:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 08:56:24 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:15:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:21:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 16:47:14 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 17:12:41 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 17:14:31 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 17:43:10 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 18:27:31 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 19:48:53 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 20:37:36 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 21:09:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:08:09 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:32:32 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 20:08:16 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 20:34:31 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 20:40:40 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 21:18:27 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:40:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 21:44:06 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:20:44 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:25:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:39:08 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:42:39 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 23:23:10 CEST)
Idempotence and Projection
David Cressey
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:04:36 CEST)
Sub operators ?
Cimode
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:15:40 CEST)
BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 13:33:33 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:24:08 CEST)
PLAN-X 2007: Call for Papers and Demos (Deadline Extended) (Nice, Jan 07)
Torsten Grust
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:35:22 CEST)
Managing Hierarchical Data - The Nested Set Model - insert node
oal_at_tiscali.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:35:47 CEST)
Re: Managing Hierarchical Data - The Nested Set Model - insert node
Cimode
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 21:26:33 CEST)
PODS 2007 Call for Papers
marenas_at_ing.puc.cl
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 21:37:25 CEST)
Interesting Data Mining Forum
jobs_hitech_at_yahoo.com
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 08:30:11 CEST)
Using the same FK in a table more then once
miklesw_at_gmail.com
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 14:04:28 CEST)
Extending binary NOR
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 15:58:31 CEST)
Re: Extending binary NOR
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 16:18:28 CEST)
Re: Extending binary NOR
David Cressey
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 17:51:25 CEST)
re:updatableViews
Rick Elbers
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 18:32:54 CEST)
Re: re:updatableViews
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Tue Sep 26 2006 - 18:44:09 CEST)
B+ tree - help
accpactec_at_hotmail.com
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 05:54:44 CEST)
Re: B+ tree - help
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 06:42:19 CEST)
Re: B+ tree - help
accpactec_at_hotmail.com
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 07:03:51 CEST)
Re: B+ tree - help
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 14:07:15 CEST)
Re: B+ tree - help
Jan Hidders
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 10:13:54 CEST)
cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Karen Hill
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 22:05:40 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 22:25:27 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Karen Hill
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 23:02:51 CEST)
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Karen Hill
(Wed Sep 27 2006 - 23:49:28 CEST)
2nd CFP for the ICDT workshop EROW 2007
Jan Hidders
(Fri Sep 29 2006 - 00:29:50 CEST)
Proposal: 6NF
Karen Hill
(Fri Sep 29 2006 - 21:35:07 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
J M Davitt
(Fri Sep 29 2006 - 23:29:54 CEST)
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Bob Badour
(Fri Sep 29 2006 - 23:56:06 CEST)
Functional Dependency to constrain a relation to exactly one element?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 20:39:44 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependency to constrain a relation to exactly one element?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 22:08:52 CEST)
Re: Functional Dependency to constrain a relation to exactly one element?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 30 2006 - 22:14:23 CEST)
Last message date
:
Sat Sep 30 2006 - 22:33:38 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 20:37:39 CEST
778 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.