Re: Extending binary NOR

From: David Cressey <dcressey_at_verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:51:25 GMT
Message-ID: <1ETQg.11$8U2.3_at_trndny08>

"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:UgSQg.33802$9u.304822_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...

> As Marshall already pointed out, n-ary NOR is the negation of a folded
> binary OR. Since binary OR is commutative, associative and idempotent,
> the n-ary NOR is just an expression based on an aggregate function.
>

Agreed.

> In other words, n-ary NOR is based on binary OR and not on binary NOR.
Received on Fri Sep 22 2006 - 17:51:25 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Cressey: "Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?"
Previous message: pamelafluente_at_libero.it: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
Maybe in reply to: David Cressey: "Extending binary NOR"
In reply to Bob Badour: "Re: Extending binary NOR"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message