Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:31:22 GMT
Message-ID: <u49Sg.6942$Iq5.6063_at_trndny02>
"Jan Hidders" <hidders_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159257366.662041.197990_at_h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> I assume you are talking about the case where R has only two columns.
I'm interested in the case where R has n columns, and the primary key has
n-1 columns.
Here's what's behind my question. relational tables with at most 1 non-key
column is where the great debate about NULLs becomes moot. If you want to
> Indeed, then it has only trivial FDs and is in BCNF. All the
> definitions agree on that, of course, because they are equivalent.
Is there anything in particular that applies to that case, and not to cases
with more than one non-key
column?