Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 15 Sep 2006 01:07:39 -0700
Message-ID: <1158307659.305145.94960_at_e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>


Bob Badour wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>
> >
> > Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> >
> >>That's an awefully long-winded way to repeat stuff others in this thread
> >>have already dealt with more accurately and more succinctly.
> >
> > A bit like quoting 90 lines to add 2? Ever hear of snipping Bob - it's
> > part of the (human)-relational model! 8-)
>
> While the content was more-or-less irrelevant, the 90 lines were central
> to the point I was making.
You may have made a point but you certainly did not get it through. You just pointed out a valid point (namely NOT using NULLS) but you did not clarify sufficiently. Being succint or consise is no excuse for assuming people will understand things right away. You should be using examples to clarify your point. And in no case, you should be blaming others for trying to clarify things. Received on Fri Sep 15 2006 - 10:07:39 CEST

Original text of this message