Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?

From: vc <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 21 Sep 2006 08:23:51 -0700
Message-ID: <1158852231.548461.321780_at_e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>


Marshall wrote:
> Phil Carmody wrote:
> > "Marshall" <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> writes:
> > > Consider min(). Min over unsigned 32 bit ints has an
> > > identity: 2^32. However, min over arbirtrary precision
> > > ints does not have an identity.
> >
> > If 2^32 is an identity over 32-bit ints, then +infinity is
> > an identity over AP ints.
>
> I understand that viewpoint, however +infinity is not an
> integer, so there are typing issues involved with that
> idea. My sense is that those issues cause more
> problems than they solve.
>
>
> Marshall

Neither is 2^32 an identity (wrt min) since it does not belong to the set of 2^32 unsigned integers which presumably contains zero. Received on Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:23:51 CEST

Original text of this message