Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
71 messages
:
Starting
Thu Sep 21 2006 - 01:17:15 CEST,
Ending
Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:26:18 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Nested structures
JOG
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:39:21 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
paul c
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 15:23:32 CEST)
Re: Nested structures
dawn
(Sat Sep 16 2006 - 17:24:36 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 01:27:42 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 11:14:12 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:26:18 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 10:19:09 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 15:19:43 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 15:34:18 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:40:58 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
J M Davitt
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:49:58 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
J M Davitt
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:53:46 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:01:00 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:41:40 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 05:05:22 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 05:26:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 05:55:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 06:08:12 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 06:19:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:11:21 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 14:44:10 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 15:11:50 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:30:41 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:03:50 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 01:17:15 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
paul c
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:32:29 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:37:26 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:02:48 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 04:11:19 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:12:26 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
vc
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:30:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 04:38:52 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:22:02 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:53:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 01:40:59 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:09:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 03:13:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 05:54:12 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:03:03 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:44:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 13:28:59 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:15:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 07:20:55 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 08:43:24 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:14:02 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:23:51 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:19:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 09:43:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:40:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:46:16 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 14:46:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:52:14 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:36:34 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:10:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:53:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:45:29 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:09:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:04:11 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:27:18 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:23:01 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:43:32 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:52:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 19:49:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 19:04:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 19:29:49 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 20:34:16 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 20:50:25 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 11:12:05 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 17:00:51 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 17:29:13 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:22:29 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:41:42 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 20:46:10 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 02:18:37 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 02:43:51 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 17:59:30 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 17:05:29 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 17:34:06 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Rick Decker
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 02:52:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 03:01:07 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 11:50:52 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 10:32:54 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 11:42:40 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Mon Sep 25 2006 - 12:01:58 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 20:42:22 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 23:37:04 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 01:58:38 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 03:50:26 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 16:54:15 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
(Sun Sep 24 2006 - 17:54:43 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vadimtro_at_gmail.com
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 02:33:39 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 11:04:49 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:36:20 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
(Sat Sep 23 2006 - 10:26:47 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 22:20:02 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:16:14 CEST)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:22:51 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Brian Selzer
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 06:02:13 CEST)
Sub operators ?
Cimode
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 12:15:40 CEST)
BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 13:33:33 CEST)
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 17:24:08 CEST)
PLAN-X 2007: Call for Papers and Demos (Deadline Extended) (Nice, Jan 07)
Torsten Grust
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:35:22 CEST)
Managing Hierarchical Data - The Nested Set Model - insert node
oal_at_tiscali.it
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:35:47 CEST)
Re: Managing Hierarchical Data - The Nested Set Model - insert node
Cimode
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 21:26:33 CEST)
PODS 2007 Call for Papers
marenas_at_ing.puc.cl
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 21:37:25 CEST)
Last message date
:
Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:26:18 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 20:37:40 CEST
71 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.