Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?

From: Chris Smith <cdsmith_at_twu.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:23:01 -0600
Message-ID: <MPG.1f7c6a4c312c3b9b98972a_at_news.altopia.net>

<pamelafluente_at_libero.it> wrote:
> Please do not go OT. Stick to the tech stuff. Will you ?

Depends. Will you pass on the cheap rhetorical shots and discuss the matter at hand? So far, there have been mixed results.

-- 
Chris Smith

Received on Thu Sep 21 2006 - 18:23:01 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marshall: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
Previous message: Marshall: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Smith: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
In reply to pamelafluente_at_libero.it: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
Next in thread: pamelafluente_at_libero.it: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
Reply: pamelafluente_at_libero.it: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message