Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?

From: <pamelafluente_at_libero.it>
Date: 21 Sep 2006 04:28:59 -0700
Message-ID: <1158838139.771829.276510_at_k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

Marshall ha scritto:
>
> > In PostgreSQL,
> > for example, that distinguished value is NULL.
>
> Argghhh! Oooooh, the agony!

that's doesn't count. Who would call a dbms a system which does even have a decently working OleDb driver ?

(flames, flames...)

>
> Marshall
Received on Thu Sep 21 2006 - 13:28:59 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: masong_at_sbcglobal.net: "BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?"
Previous message: pamelafluente_at_libero.it: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
In reply to: Marshall: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
In reply to Chris Smith: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
Next in thread: Chris Smith: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message