Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval

From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 18 Sep 2006 10:11:38 -0700
Message-ID: <1158599498.575391.102720_at_m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>


pamelafluente_at_libero.it wrote:
>
> This is not philosophy. Please use logic/math argument to respond.
> Do not just say that I do not understand. That's not a logic argument.
>
> If my argument has a flaw, please, Marshall or Bob or anyone, point out
> * exacly where it is * so that I can see it.

Pamela,

I already did that.

I can think of five possible explanations for your above post:

  1. There is some language barrier that is preventing you from understanding what I'm writing.
  2. You are skimming over my posts and not reading them thoroughly enough.
  3. You lack sufficient intelligence to understand what I'm saying.
  4. You are not willing to do the work to understand what I'm saying
  5. You are a troll and are only pretending to be interested in this question.

In none of the above circumstances is it worth my time to continue trying
to explain this to you.

On the outside chance that you actually are motivated and capable of mastering this material, I will again say that I've already explained
all the necessary points, and you have only to read my posts *carefully* to figure out why your count distinct argument doesn't work.

Marshall Received on Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:11:38 CEST

Original text of this message