Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by author
comp.databases.theory: by author
51 messages
:
Starting
Mon Sep 18 2006 - 02:14:04 CDT,
Ending
Mon Sep 18 2006 - 09:35:53 CDT
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Author view
] [
Next, Author view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
-CELKO-
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 21:14:59 CDT)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 16:55:36 CDT)
Alfredo Novoa
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 12:00:50 CDT)
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:58:17 CDT)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:46:48 CDT)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:39:34 CDT)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:23:49 CDT)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:16:46 CDT)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 08:15:22 CDT)
Brian Selzer
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 09:53:14 CDT)
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:41:07 CDT)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:22:45 CDT)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 15:58:30 CDT)
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:15:34 CDT)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:25:01 CDT)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 21:55:15 CDT)
Cimode
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 16:11:29 CDT)
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 15:22:55 CDT)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 15:16:53 CDT)
Re: Columns without names
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 06:48:35 CDT)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 06:44:04 CDT)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 06:20:58 CDT)
Frank Hamersley
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:47:29 CDT)
Gene Wirchenko
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 14:38:00 CDT)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 11:15:28 CDT)
J M Davitt
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:00:30 CDT)
JOG
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 20:21:32 CDT)
Re: Columns without names
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 18:57:11 CDT)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 17:02:12 CDT)
Johnny
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:00:04 CDT)
kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 13:14:42 CDT)
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:56:22 CDT)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:55:43 CDT)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:38:45 CDT)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 12:11:38 CDT)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 11:51:02 CDT)
mAsterdam
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 17:43:06 CDT)
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Ternary Relationship cardinality
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 13:57:27 CDT)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 18:54:32 CDT)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 17:15:30 CDT)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 02:27:25 CDT)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 02:14:04 CDT)
Roy Hann
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 14:32:35 CDT)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 10:38:20 CDT)
Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 04:18:01 CDT)
thejackal51
Office Networking
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 09:35:53 CDT)
Volker Hetzer
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 15:54:10 CDT)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 14:16:55 CDT)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 10:21:39 CDT)
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:21:43 CDT)
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:43:31 CDT)
Last message date
:
Mon Sep 18 2006 - 09:35:53 CDT
Archived on
: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 15:51:58 CDT
51 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Author view
] [
Next, Author view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US