Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
35 messages
:
Starting
Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:08:21 CEST,
Ending
Mon Sep 18 2006 - 16:35:53 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
mAsterdam
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:08:21 CEST)
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
JOG
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:33:02 CEST)
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
Cimode
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:11:29 CEST)
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
mAsterdam
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 00:43:06 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 17:21:39 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 03:30:43 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 09:27:25 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:11:38 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 20:14:42 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 00:15:30 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 01:54:32 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 02:38:45 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:36:38 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 09:14:04 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
(Sun Sep 17 2006 - 22:38:44 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 03:05:36 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:15:53 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 01:40:28 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 02:31:54 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
JOG
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 02:24:10 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 13:44:04 CEST)
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 18:51:02 CEST)
Re: Columns without names
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 13:48:35 CEST)
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 16:53:14 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 18:15:28 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 21:16:55 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Frank Hamersley
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 02:47:29 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 21:32:35 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:58:30 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:23:49 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:41:07 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:56:22 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:06:09 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:05:51 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:16:56 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 04:59:11 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 05:23:50 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 20:45:43 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:52:15 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 05:00:55 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 05:25:32 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 20:46:05 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 12:12:27 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 14:21:57 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:55:43 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 07:04:15 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 13:19:12 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 14:16:14 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 15:28:54 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 16:01:10 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 21:11:47 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 23:17:32 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 11:57:29 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Wed Sep 20 2006 - 20:35:50 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 01:27:42 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Jan Hidders
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 11:14:12 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:26:18 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 10:19:09 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 15:19:43 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 15:34:18 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
(Fri Sep 22 2006 - 18:40:58 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
J M Davitt
(Thu Sep 21 2006 - 02:49:58 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 21:38:00 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:54:10 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:16:46 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:22:45 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
(Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:58:17 CEST)
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:22:55 CEST)
Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Roy Hann
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 11:18:01 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 13:20:58 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Bob Badour
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 15:15:22 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 19:00:50 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
-CELKO-
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 23:55:36 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Roy Hann
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 17:38:20 CEST)
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 22:16:53 CEST)
Office Networking
thejackal51
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 16:35:53 CEST)
Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
(Mon Sep 18 2006 - 20:57:27 CEST)
Last message date
:
Mon Sep 18 2006 - 16:35:53 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 20:37:40 CEST
35 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Thread view
] [
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.