Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:16:46 GMT
Message-ID: <OaKPg.22748$9u.271101_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

Volker Hetzer wrote:

> Gene Wirchenko schrieb:
>

>> Volker Hetzer <firstname.lastname_at_ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Gene Wirchenko schrieb:
>>>
>>>> Volker Hetzer <firstname.lastname_at_ieee.org> wrote:

Since default values are not necessary, this whole thread of discussion is an empty waste of time. Received on Tue Sep 19 2006 - 06:16:46 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: William Hughes: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
Previous message: Chris Smith: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
In reply to: Volker Hetzer: "Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?"
Next in thread: Chris Lim: "Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?"
Reply: Chris Lim: "Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message