Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Date: 13 Sep 2006 12:55:09 -0700
Message-ID: <1158177308.956879.258460_at_d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
pamelafluente_at_libero.it wrote:
> Cimode ha scritto:
>
> > pamelafluente_at_libero.it wrote:
> > > David Cressey ha scritto:
> > > > On the subject of ignorance, I find that the more I learn, the more of my
> > > > own ignorance I become aware of.
> > > >
> > >
> > > What we know is such an insignificant part of what we don't that there
> > > is not even point
> > > to compare our ignorances.
> > Blah, blah...And the sky is blue and the fish swim...Go play philosophy
> > on comp.idophilosophybecauseIknowshitabuotdatamanagement.
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> I made you some question. Are you only capable to tell others they are
> ignorants, or do you also intend some help through this newsgroup?
My name is not Bob you idiot...You are still stuck on your own delusion
that I may be the same person...
> I may not know technical terms because a twofold reason: a theoretical
> ignorance and an idiom language, but I do have real world problems, not
> phylosophy, which you can help with, if you will.
I do not OWE you an education you idiot. Especially if you can't even
recognize that
you are an ignorant and are not inclined to do anything about
it..People in this NG (including myself) have given pointers, books to
help you educate yourself but you decide to persist in your ignorance.
Therefore get back to your "Learn data management in 21 days " approach
and stop wasting our time...
> So are you able to suggest a good "split" algorithm. Let me know if I
> was not able to explain the terms of the problem. I would try to state
> it better. Is that a problem that is denoted with some specific term in
> the theory?
Since when Algorhythmics and programming theory can be relevant to
discuss dat management issues? You idiot.
> -P
Received on Wed Sep 13 2006 - 21:55:09 CEST