Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
From: Chris Smith <cdsmith_at_twu.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:42:39 -0600
Message-ID: <MPG.1f7a042c19855bc198971d_at_news.altopia.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 14:42:39 -0600
Message-ID: <MPG.1f7a042c19855bc198971d_at_news.altopia.net>
<pamelafluente_at_libero.it> wrote:
> Further, Chris, who you think highly of, seems to have a different
> opinion, and he is saying the counterexample works.
Hi, Pamela. Please don't do that. I do believe that your counterexample, but let's discuss and consider everyone's viewpoints. Marshall is every bit as likely to be right as I am. Let's see what everyone thinks, and go from there. Sorry, but that kind of rhetorical device gets under my skin sometimes; I don't take offense if Marshall disagrees with me, and neither should anyone else.
-- Chris SmithReceived on Tue Sep 19 2006 - 22:42:39 CEST