Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by date
comp.databases.theory: by date
96 messages
:
Starting
Tue Sep 19 2006 - 00:02:12 CEST,
Ending
Tue Sep 19 2006 - 23:23:10 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Date view
] [
Next, Date view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Tuesday, 19 September 2006
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
mAsterdam
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
J M Davitt
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Frank Hamersley
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
JOG
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
-CELKO-
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Johnny
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Jonathan Leffler
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jonathan Leffler
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Sampo Syreeni
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Idempotence and Projection
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Columns without names
Jan Hidders
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
-CELKO-
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Last message date
:
Tue Sep 19 2006 - 23:23:10 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 20:37:40 CEST
96 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Previous, Date view
] [
Next, Date view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.