Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:17:32 GMT
Message-ID: <M7ZPg.26527$9u.277622@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

JOG wrote:

> Bob Badour wrote:
>

>>What is NULL if not the basis for 3 valued logic or 4 valued logic?

>
> An ugly hack to workaround the fact that most designers are either too
> lazy or too lacking in pride to design their databases correctly?

Um, well okay, but I guess I was asking for an answer from the folks who want to rationalize the ugly hack somehow. Received on Tue Sep 19 2006 - 16:17:32 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: pamelafluente_at_libero.it: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
Previous message: Chris Smith: "Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?"
In reply to: JOG: "Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?"
Next in thread: peter koch: "Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?"
Reply: peter koch: "Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US