Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?

From: <pamelafluente_at_libero.it>
Date: 20 Sep 2006 05:51:54 -0700
Message-ID: <1158756714.284925.80780@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Bob Badour ha scritto:

> William Hughes wrote:
>
> > Chris Smith wrote:
> >
> >>Reordering to avoid repetition...

Hi Bob :)

> >>
> >>William Hughes <wpihughes_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> > into A. Still there is a second more fundamental issue. What could
> > the binary form of a function that find the largest five elements be?
>
> A special case of restrict that doesn't aggregate anything.

Right. If n < 6 it certainly doesn't (or perhaps still does?) :))

>
> As are all quota queries, which are special cases of restrict that don't
> aggregate anything.

back to start. what "aggregate" means ? ;)

P Received on Wed Sep 20 2006 - 07:51:54 CDT