Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables

Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables

From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com>
Date: 6 Sep 2006 12:25:19 -0700
Message-ID: <1157570719.431254.152250@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>

vc wrote:
> Jan Hidders wrote:
> [...]
> >. Note btw. that they are a strict
> > subclass of the restrictions that might be expressed by some kind of
> > temporal logic.
>
> What temporal logic do you have in mind ?

First order logic extended with the 'since', 'until', 'next' and 'previous' operators.

> It's known that first-order
> temporal logic is strictly less expressive than FOL for a relational
> database augmented in a natural way with a timestamp column, or in
> other words FOTL is less expressive than two sorted FOL with the time
> domain as an additional sort ( the propositional fragments of both are
> equivalent).

Indeed, even if you extend it with temporal operators for all regular expressions, but that is not what I was comparing it to.

Received on Wed Sep 06 2006 - 14:25:19 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US