Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by date
comp.databases.theory: by date
783 messages
:
Starting
Fri Sep 01 2006 - 08:41:01 CDT,
Ending
Sat Sep 30 2006 - 20:39:16 CDT
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Friday, 1 September
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
vc
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
erk
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Bob Badour
Order details table reference live data
Johan Sjöström
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
vc
Re: Order details table reference live data
Bob Badour
Re: Order details table reference live data
Johan Sjöström
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
Re: Order details table reference live data
Bob Badour
Saturday, 2 September
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Order details table reference live data
David Cressey
Re: Order details table reference live data
David Cressey
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Sunday, 3 September
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
Re: Order details table reference live data
Alexandr Savinov
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Order details table reference live data
Johan Sjöström
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
mrettig
Monday, 4 September
Re: Terminology question
Jonathan Leffler
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
Jan Hidders
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Keith H Duggar
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Marshall
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Marshall
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Marshall
Re: Terminology question
Marshall
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Tuesday, 5 September
Re: Terminology question
Cimode
Re: Order details table reference live data
Cimode
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Jan Hidders
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
Re: Terminology question
David Cressey
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Sampo Syreeni
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Terminology question
erk
Re: looking for old Datamation poster on Normalizing
-CELKO-
Re: Terminology question
David Cressey
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
Jan Hidders
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
mAsterdam
Re: Functional Dependencies > Uniqueness Constraints
J M Davitt
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
J M Davitt
Wednesday, 6 September
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Terminology question
Cimode
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
Cimode
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
vc
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Bob Badour
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
Bob Badour
Re: Terminology question
Bob Badour
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
Cimode
Re: Terminology question: (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
mAsterdam
Re: Terminology question
Marshall
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
vc
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Terminology question
Marshall
abstraction of table relationships
Marshall
Thursday, 7 September
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Terminology question
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Alexandr Savinov
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jan Hidders
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Jan Hidders
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Cimode
TSD 2006 Last Call for Participation
TSD 2006
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Bob Badour
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Dan
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)
Cimode
Re: Book advertising
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Book advertising
Cimode
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
Re: abstraction of table relationships
JOG
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Cimode
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
David Cressey
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Bob Badour
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
David Cressey
Re: abstraction of table relationships
David Cressey
Re: abstraction of table relationships
Bob Badour
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Bob Badour
Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Faisal
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Bob Badour
Friday, 8 September
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Marshall
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Brian Selzer
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Roy Hann
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
Jon Heggland
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
Re: Relation Schemata vs. Relation Variables
JOG
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
David Cressey
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Roy Hann
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
David Cressey
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't
Cimode
3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Karen Hill
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
frosty
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Evan Keel
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Saturday, 9 September
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Alexandr Savinov
I have no blog
-CELKO-
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Keith H Duggar
Sunday, 10 September
Re: Phd guy teaches the Data Mining
Frank Hamersley
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Evan Keel
Re: I have no blog
Evan Keel
Monday, 11 September
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Paul
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
Tuesday, 12 September
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
DW/Kimball Method Consultant recommendations
littldo_at_yahoo.com
CFP: IADIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE APPLIED COMPUTING 2007
natty2006_at_gmail.com
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Paul
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Paul
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Johnny
Re: DW/Kimball Method Consultant recommendations
FreeData
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
Nested structures
dawn
Wednesday, 13 September
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Jan Hidders
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Alexandr Savinov
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Damien
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Alexandr Savinov
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Alexandr Savinov
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Alexandr Savinov
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: I have no blog
Larry Coon
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Johnny
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Thursday, 14 September
Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
FreeData
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Jan Hidders
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Paul
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: I have no blog
Evan Keel
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: I have no blog
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
J M Davitt
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
Friday, 15 September
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Dan
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Cimode
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
J M Davitt
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
Bob Badour
Re: On what OLAP can and what OLAP can't - A little problem
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Nested structures
Rob
Re: Nested structures
Bob Badour
Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
David Cressey
Re: Order details table reference live data
Johnny
Re: Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Nested structures
dawn
Re: Nested structures
dawn
Re: Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
David Cressey
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
Re: Nested structures
JOG
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Keith H Duggar
Columns without names
JOG
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Bob Badour
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
J M Davitt
Saturday, 16 September
Re: Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Cimode
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Pizza, anyone? Was:Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Columns without names
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
David Cressey
Re: Nested structures
paul c
Re: Columns without names
paul c
Re: Columns without names
paul c
Re: Nested structures
paul c
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
Re: Nested structures
dawn
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
dawn
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: Columns without names
dawn
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
CMCC
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Portas
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Columns without names
Brian Selzer
Re: Columns without names
Brian Selzer
Sunday, 17 September
Two relations with the same attributes (was: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?)
mAsterdam
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
Re: Real world issue: Steps towards a unified method
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Download the JAVA , .NET and SQL Server interview PDF
Jobs
Re: Nested structures
David Cressey
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Alexandr Savinov
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Download the JAVA , .NET and SQL Server interview PDF
Bob Badour
Re: Nested structures
Bob Badour
Re: Real world issue: How to "split" queries in presence of record replication and replication sensitive aggregate functions ?
Bob Badour
Re: Two relations with the same attributes (was: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?)
Cimode
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Cimode
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Bob Badour
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
mAsterdam
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
JOG
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Bob Badour
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Monday, 18 September
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Roy Hann
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
David Cressey
Re: Columns without names
David Cressey
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Bob Badour
Office Networking
thejackal51
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Roy Hann
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Gene Wirchenko
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Alfredo Novoa
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com
Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Gene Wirchenko
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
Cimode
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
-CELKO-
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
JOG
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Two relations with the same attributes
mAsterdam
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
J M Davitt
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Frank Hamersley
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
JOG
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
-CELKO-
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Johnny
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Tuesday, 19 September
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Jonathan Leffler
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jonathan Leffler
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Multiple keys and transition constraints
Brian Selzer
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: Real world issue:- OT recreational interval
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Sampo Syreeni
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Idempotence and Projection
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Columns without names
Jan Hidders
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
Jan Hidders
Re: Ternary Relationship cardinality
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
-CELKO-
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Who first (publicly) asserted 3NF is "good enough"?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Chris Lim
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Wednesday, 20 September
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Columns without names
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and Projection
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and Projection
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and Projection
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and Projection
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and Projection
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
Re: Columns without names
paul c
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Columns without names
paul c
Re: Columns without names
Bob Badour
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
J M Davitt
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
J M Davitt
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Columns without names
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Columns without names
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Thursday, 21 September
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Jan Hidders
Re: Columns without names
JOG
Sub operators ?
Cimode
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Nested structures
JOG
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
William Hughes
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Nested structures
paul c
Re: Columns without names
vc
PLAN-X 2007: Call for Papers and Demos (Deadline Extended) (Nice, Jan 07)
Torsten Grust
Managing Hierarchical Data - The Nested Set Model - insert node
oal_at_tiscali.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Managing Hierarchical Data - The Nested Set Model - insert node
Cimode
PODS 2007 Call for Papers
marenas_at_ing.puc.cl
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Volker Hetzer
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Brian Selzer
Friday, 22 September
Interesting Data Mining Forum
jobs_hitech_at_yahoo.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
peter koch
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Using the same FK in a table more then once
miklesw_at_gmail.com
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
paul c
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
JOG
Extending binary NOR
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Roy Hann
Re: Extending binary NOR
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Extending binary NOR
David Cressey
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: 3 value logic. Why is SQL so special?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vadimtro_at_gmail.com
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Rick Decker
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Saturday, 23 September
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Using the same FK in a table more then once
-CELKO-
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? -OT break
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ? -OT break
HansF
Sunday, 24 September
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Aloha Kakuikanu
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Chris Smith
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Monday, 25 September
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Phil Carmody
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Empty Names (was: Idempotence ad nauseum)
Marshall
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Empty Names
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Brian Selzer
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
masong_at_sbcglobal.net
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
paul c
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Tuesday, 26 September
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
David Cressey
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
re:updatableViews
Rick Elbers
Re: re:updatableViews
Aloha Kakuikanu
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Order details table reference live data
vldm10
Re: Order details table reference live data
Bob Badour
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
vc
B+ tree - help
accpactec_at_hotmail.com
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
Marshall
Re: B+ tree - help
Bob Badour
Wednesday, 27 September
Re: B+ tree - help
accpactec_at_hotmail.com
Re: Idempotence and "Replication Insensitivity" are equivalent ?
pamelafluente_at_libero.it
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Brian Selzer
Re: B+ tree - help
Jan Hidders
Re: re:updatableViews
Cimode
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
David Cressey
Re: B+ tree - help
Bob Badour
Re: Order details table reference live data
JOG
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Jan Hidders
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
Marshall
Re: updatableViews
Rick Elbers
Re: Order details table reference live data
vldm10
cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Karen Hill
Re: re:updatableViews
Lennart
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Gene Wirchenko
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Karen Hill
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Karen Hill
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
David Portas
Re: updatableViews
paul c
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Marshall
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Jonathan Leffler
Thursday, 28 September
Re: updatableViews
Cimode
Re: BCNF: superkey or candidate key ?
David Cressey
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
David Cressey
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Cimode
Re: cyclical redundancy checksum algorithm(s)?
Volker Hetzer
2nd CFP for the ICDT workshop EROW 2007
Jan Hidders
Friday, 29 September
Proposal: 6NF
Karen Hill
Re: Proposal: 6NF
J M Davitt
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Bob Badour
Re: updatableViews
Rick Elbers
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Karen Hill
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Bob Badour
Re: Proposal: 6NF
paul c
Re: Proposal: 6NF
paul c
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Bob Badour
Re: Proposal: 6NF
paul c
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Bob Badour
Re: Proposal: 6NF
frosty
Saturday, 30 September
Re: Proposal: 6NF
David Cressey
Re: Proposal: 6NF
JOG
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Brian Selzer
Re: Proposal: 6NF
David Portas
Functional Dependency to constrain a relation to exactly one element?
Marshall
Re: Functional Dependency to constrain a relation to exactly one element?
Jan Hidders
Re: Functional Dependency to constrain a relation to exactly one element?
Marshall
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Roy Hann
Re: Proposal: 6NF
JOG
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Karen Hill
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Marshall
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Brian Selzer
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Brian Selzer
Re: Proposal: 6NF
Brian Selzer
Re: Functional Dependency to constrain a relation to exactly one element?
vc
Last message date
:
Sat Sep 30 2006 - 20:39:16 CDT
Archived on
: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 15:51:58 CDT
783 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
