Re: cdt glossary [Function] (was: Terminology question)

From: <pamelafluente_at_libero.it>
Date: 7 Sep 2006 06:34:39 -0700
Message-ID: <1157636079.588649.104040_at_m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>


:))

Sorry *Bob* , ad said Kim Basinger to Bruce Willis in "Blind date" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092666/):

"you missed your chance!" ;)

-P

Cimode ha scritto:

> > > Subjectivity and limited scope context does NOT redefine mathematical
> > > concepts. It is actually the characteristics of mathematical empirical
> > > sound reasonning to be objective and context independent. If you try
> > > to define such concepts according to context then you are setting
> > > limited scope reasonning which in most cases can be applied in one and
> > > only one concept.
> >
> > I agree with the above. I am not talking of "define such concepts
> > according to context ".
> > I am talking to make clear the scope of the definition.
> So you are contradicting yourself. On one hand, you state that
> definition of abstract concepts is made by context, then you state that
> you agree with the precise opposite.

>...

> > Take it easy: life is short :)
> An additional reason for not filling it with meaningless crappola. ;)
Received on Thu Sep 07 2006 - 15:34:39 CEST

Original text of this message