comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 00:47:26 CDT)
- Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 03:47:16 CDT)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 08:32:28 CDT)
- Re: Career questions: databases Cimode (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 03:53:41 CDT)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Keith H Duggar (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 14:44:48 CDT)
- Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 05:37:38 CDT)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 09:53:42 CDT)
    - Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 12:21:58 CDT)
      - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 13:55:42 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 14:00:45 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Lennart (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 16:24:19 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 16:52:05 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Lennart (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:16:02 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Larry Linson (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 20:15:20 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Marshall (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 09:42:32 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 12:29:28 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Cimode (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 12:57:04 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 13:20:34 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 14:00:59 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Cimode (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 14:06:09 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 15:25:21 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 01:48:08 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Cimode (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 03:02:40 CDT)
      - Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 15:34:04 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 16:49:54 CDT)
    - Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 14:51:44 CDT)
      - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 16:46:19 CDT)
      - Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 16:53:20 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 18:23:15 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 05:13:03 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 12:32:24 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 13:25:56 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 16:51:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:02:16 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:26:58 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 16:57:41 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:41:51 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:42:08 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:11:16 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:27:40 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 01:55:03 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 04:58:17 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 02:02:28 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 02:12:12 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 05:25:52 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 06:44:31 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases joel garry (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:05:26 CDT)
- Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 09:47:00 CDT)
  - Re: Career questions: databases hpuxrac (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 12:42:30 CDT)
    - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 13:19:43 CDT)
      - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 14:05:27 CDT)
      - Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 06:39:01 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 08:45:32 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 10:22:07 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 11:15:58 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 12:10:48 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 14:11:17 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 16:44:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:18:03 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:43:28 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:51:24 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:04:18 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:29:10 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:43:44 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:02:43 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:13:11 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases rkc (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 20:28:42 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:17:10 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:52:38 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:03:23 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:38:03 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:53:16 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 20:19:50 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 20:42:58 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:02:21 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:29:41 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:46:11 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 22:10:37 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases David Cressey (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:33:51 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 04:15:32 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 10:47:35 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 11:00:34 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 11:03:22 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 11:17:42 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 11:46:51 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 12:07:15 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 16:22:40 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Gene Wirchenko (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 17:32:57 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bruce C. Baker (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 17:43:47 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 04:48:27 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 19:51:22 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases dreamznatcher (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 04:08:45 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 11:09:41 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 17:02:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Wed Jul 04 2007 - 19:28:46 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:26:33 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:39:31 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:46:32 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 03:38:29 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases Larry Linson (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:06:50 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 19:23:35 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:36:48 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:44:48 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:27:05 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:42:16 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Keith Wilby (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 03:17:28 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 03:50:43 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 06:32:53 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 11:59:27 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 13:10:21 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 13:41:54 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 15:05:25 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 15:49:12 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 15:54:41 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 16:04:29 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:21:08 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:23:20 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:07:05 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:20:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:34:54 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Neil (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 18:42:29 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:37:11 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 22:13:24 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 15:55:59 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 16:02:37 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:03:29 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases '69 Camaro (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:37:43 CDT)
        Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 16:58:33 CDT)
        
        Re: Career questions: databases Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:29:11 CDT)
    - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 14:04:23 CDT)
      - Re: Career questions: databases hpuxrac (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 14:31:14 CDT)
- Re: Career questions: databases Tony Toews [MVP] (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 23:20:16 CDT)
  - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 02:05:25 CDT)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 08:42:56 CDT)
- Re: Career questions: databases EdStevens (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 07:37:58 CDT)
  - Re: Career questions: databases Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 08:12:15 CDT)
    - Re: Career questions: databases DA Morgan (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 09:00:21 CDT)
How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 03:15:24 CDT)
- Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 08:30:05 CDT)
  - Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 08:56:26 CDT)
    - Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 09:15:28 CDT)
      - Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 10:39:02 CDT)
        
        Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Jonathan Leffler (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 20:06:55 CDT)
        
        Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 20:54:06 CDT)
        
        Re: How to make sure I don't write a corrupt page to db when I checkpoint? DBMS_Plumber (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 13:28:09 CDT)
How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 03:27:54 CDT)
- Re: How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? Bob Badour (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 08:35:31 CDT)
  - Re: How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? Sune (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 08:38:39 CDT)
- Re: How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? JianC.Xie_at_gmail.com (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 08:48:29 CDT)
- Re: How to flush data most efficiently from memory to disk when db checkpoint? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Sun Jul 01 2007 - 12:18:02 CDT)
what exactly is the conceptual model? Senges (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 16:08:11 CDT)
- Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Roy Hann (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 16:59:14 CDT)
  - Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:47:22 CDT)
- Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Bob Badour (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 17:24:25 CDT)
  - Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? DM Unseen (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 02:27:49 CDT)
    - Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Bob Badour (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 06:29:47 CDT)
- Re: what exactly is the conceptual model? Jan Hidders (Tue Jul 03 2007 - 10:39:04 CDT)
What happened to Dali/Datablitz? Sune (Mon Jul 02 2007 - 21:55:53 CDT)
- Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz? DBMS_Plumber (Sun Jul 08 2007 - 14:00:50 CDT)
  - Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz? Sune (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 01:33:41 CDT)
    - Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz? Gene Wirchenko (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 10:11:42 CDT)
    - Re: What happened to Dali/Datablitz? DBMS_Plumber (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 12:58:09 CDT)
A Simple Notation David Cressey (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 06:21:52 CDT)
- Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 07:11:08 CDT)
  - Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 08:07:44 CDT)
    - Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 15:45:53 CDT)
      - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 19:06:24 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 19:14:10 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 01:55:48 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 08:18:02 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 10:10:11 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 14:27:59 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 18:52:15 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 22:50:14 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 10:30:32 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 10:55:03 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 12:10:54 CDT)
        Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 06:01:00 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 08:18:05 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:38:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Jan Hidders (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 10:13:31 CDT)
        Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:22:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:35:36 CDT)
- Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 08:18:33 CDT)
  - Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 08:35:55 CDT)
    - Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 08:55:37 CDT)
      - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 10:08:08 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 11:07:47 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 18:33:44 CDT)
    - Re: A Simple Notation Vadim Tropashko (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 11:30:57 CDT)
      - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 20:30:14 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation Vadim Tropashko (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 23:16:00 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 08:26:20 CDT)
- Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 09:36:33 CDT)
  - Re: A Simple Notation Bob Badour (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 09:45:39 CDT)
  - Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 11:56:00 CDT)
    - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Thu Jul 05 2007 - 18:50:19 CDT)
      - Re: A Simple Notation Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 00:45:10 CDT)
    - Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Fri Jul 06 2007 - 18:57:53 CDT)
      - Re: A Simple Notation David Cressey (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 00:04:41 CDT)
        
        Re: A Simple Notation paul c (Sat Jul 07 2007 - 09:53:19 CDT)
difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 08:39:30 CDT)
- Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause David Portas (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 08:59:09 CDT)
  - Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Bob Badour (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:24:01 CDT)
    - Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:35:37 CDT)
      - Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Bob Badour (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 10:16:19 CDT)
  - Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:26:27 CDT)
    - Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Bob Badour (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:40:29 CDT)
      - Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:48:29 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Bob Badour (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 10:18:10 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 11:13:00 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 11:36:10 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 11:57:28 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Lennart (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 12:19:15 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 12:44:18 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Lennart (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 13:06:18 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 14:22:50 CDT)
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 12:39:28 CDT)
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Bob Badour (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 12:36:30 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Mike (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 14:19:10 CDT)
        
        Re: difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Bob Badour (Tue Jul 10 2007 - 15:18:04 CDT)
performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options Mike (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 08:21:45 CDT)
- Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options Roy Hann (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 09:20:17 CDT)
  - Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options Mike (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 09:49:33 CDT)
    - Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options David Cressey (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 12:25:04 CDT)
- Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options Bob Badour (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 09:35:40 CDT)
  - Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options Mike (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 09:52:17 CDT)
    - Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options Bob Badour (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 10:01:12 CDT)
- Re: performance difference between UNION operator and OR in where clause Options Nis Jørgensen (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 11:42:08 CDT)
A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 15:02:30 CDT)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Wed Jul 11 2007 - 15:25:07 CDT)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 06:56:11 CDT)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 07:23:00 CDT)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 08:15:05 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 08:30:41 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 08:54:49 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 08:39:42 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 11:25:21 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 12:19:58 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 14:21:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 14:33:50 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 03:25:10 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 04:10:19 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 04:28:53 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 07:00:39 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 07:35:55 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 10:02:06 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 12:37:42 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 10:56:36 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 10:22:05 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 10:47:21 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 12:29:33 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 20:18:19 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 16:46:33 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 17:31:17 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 07:45:02 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. DBMS_Plumber (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 01:19:36 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 04:16:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. DBMS_Plumber (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 15:41:29 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 07:44:26 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 17:01:33 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 03:14:27 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 16:15:38 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 17:47:59 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 22:28:58 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 03:41:40 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:25:04 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 09:59:14 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:12:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 05:56:15 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:28:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 08:39:02 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Nis Jørgensen (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 08:26:55 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 21:42:42 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:22:53 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 20:22:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 00:16:18 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:18:27 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:38:15 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:54:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 12:56:35 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 22:07:49 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:23:51 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 12:23:26 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 03:03:48 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:26:01 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 09:43:15 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 11:03:24 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:08:15 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. joelle.alcock_at_gmail.com (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 19:13:45 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 19:16:34 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 02:41:50 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 03:20:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 05:57:07 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:57:13 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:18:42 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 02:27:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:27:39 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:47:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:51:34 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:32:19 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:14:32 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:23:35 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:47:56 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:06:29 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:16:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:28:16 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:48:00 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:18:46 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:15:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:38:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:34:29 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:46:24 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 08:33:16 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:06:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 22:10:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 23:13:56 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 10:51:32 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:44:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 00:43:49 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 01:25:50 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:22:35 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:39:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 07:18:23 CDT)
        Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*... David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:13:35 CDT)
        
        Re: Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*... paul c (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 19:57:45 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:07:13 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:58:30 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 05:35:36 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 01:22:27 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:36:03 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 23:51:31 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 09:20:29 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 10:12:45 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Roy Hann (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 11:21:24 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 13:31:09 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 13:32:29 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Cimode (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 13:55:37 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 14:59:05 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 15:43:31 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 18:10:26 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 23:31:44 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 03:46:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 10:30:52 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 16:25:51 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 11:28:13 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 15:03:00 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 17:19:08 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 18:40:41 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 23:17:24 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 03:56:57 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 09:54:14 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 10:56:13 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 11:07:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 04:09:08 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 12:39:26 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 04:01:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 15:29:35 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 12:09:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 11:34:36 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Sat Jul 14 2007 - 08:55:25 CDT)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Lennart (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 09:17:35 CDT)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jonathan Leffler (Thu Jul 12 2007 - 23:00:22 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 04:03:40 CDT)
B+ tree: How to obtain key from value Dimitry (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 04:53:49 CDT)
- Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value Jonathan Leffler (Sat Jul 14 2007 - 00:25:56 CDT)
  - Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value arthursable_at_myway.com (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 07:06:08 CDT)
    - Re: B+ tree: How to obtain key from value Jonathan Leffler (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 16:18:29 CDT)
At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 17:23:24 CDT)
- Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Jan Hidders (Fri Jul 13 2007 - 18:13:47 CDT)
  - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Sat Jul 14 2007 - 10:20:43 CDT)
    - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Jan Hidders (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 03:45:22 CDT)
      - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 09:37:28 CDT)
        
        Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Bob Badour (Sun Jul 15 2007 - 10:32:37 CDT)
        
        Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Jan Hidders (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 11:24:23 CDT)
        
        Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:52:12 CDT)
        
        Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost Jan Hidders (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 12:12:56 CDT)
    - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost vldm10 (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 17:13:48 CDT)
      - Re: At what ANSI/SPARC level are you, when creating new... totally lost paul c (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 17:30:45 CDT)
A simple notation, again David Cressey (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 09:15:48 CDT)
- Re: A simple notation, again Aloha Kakuikanu (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 10:24:56 CDT)
- Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 10:56:42 CDT)
  - Re: A simple notation, again Vadim Tropashko (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 13:58:24 CDT)
    - Re: A simple notation, again Vadim Tropashko (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 14:09:38 CDT)
- Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 11:57:10 CDT)
- Re: A simple notation, again Bob Badour (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 12:36:20 CDT)
  - Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 14:46:53 CDT)
    - Re: A simple notation, again Bob Badour (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 17:54:14 CDT)
      - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 22:03:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 00:36:27 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 08:51:49 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again Bob Badour (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 12:12:05 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:44:47 CDT)
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 08:52:42 CDT)
- Re: A simple notation, again Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 13:05:34 CDT)
  - Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 02:16:12 CDT)
    - Re: A simple notation, again mAsterdam (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 15:27:53 CDT)
  - Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 03:10:59 CDT)
    - Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 08:57:52 CDT)
      - Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 13:59:05 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 20:48:47 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:39:06 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:53:21 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 23:47:01 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:38:17 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:39:39 CDT)
        Re: A simple notation, again Bob Badour (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 07:45:43 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 14:53:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 16:20:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again paul c (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:39:49 CDT)
      - Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 02:48:31 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 06:41:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again mAsterdam (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 15:39:25 CDT)
        
        Re: A simple notation, again Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:52:38 CDT)
    - Re: A simple notation, again Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 16:19:13 CDT)
      - Re: A simple notation, again Lennart (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 14:52:32 CDT)
Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 14:14:14 CDT)
- Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Bob Badour (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 14:29:06 CDT)
  - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 14:55:11 CDT)
    - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Bob Badour (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 17:58:56 CDT)
      - Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 21:31:45 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Bob Badour (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 21:49:07 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 16 2007 - 22:17:31 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 00:54:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? TroyK (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 10:08:23 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 10:10:35 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 10:39:34 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:31:13 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:34:30 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Sat Jul 21 2007 - 15:48:07 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 11:57:37 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 12:35:37 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 10:28:32 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 11:03:09 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 11:15:44 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:00:19 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 12:39:09 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:24:28 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 15:46:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 20:37:25 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 12:48:42 CDT)
        
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:32:10 CDT)
        Re: Lots of Idiotic Silly Braces? paul c (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 17:23:20 CDT)
question using aggregate function Mia (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 15:29:35 CDT)
- Re: question using aggregate function David Portas (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 15:56:02 CDT)
  - Re: question using aggregate function paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 19:14:06 CDT)
    - Re: question using aggregate function Bob Badour (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 20:09:42 CDT)
      - Re: question using aggregate function paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 22:28:27 CDT)
        
        Re: question using aggregate function paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 22:31:41 CDT)
        
        Re: question using aggregate function Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 07:17:04 CDT)
        
        Re: question using aggregate function David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:01:00 CDT)
        
        Re: question using aggregate function Bob Badour (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 11:04:58 CDT)
        Re: question using aggregate function TroyK (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 09:38:21 CDT)
        
        Re: question using aggregate function TroyK (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 11:43:12 CDT)
  - Re: question using aggregate function Jonathan Leffler (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 22:57:04 CDT)
    - Re: question using aggregate function David Portas (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 01:18:06 CDT)
- Re: question using aggregate function David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 00:03:21 CDT)
  - Re: question using aggregate function David Cressey (Wed Jul 18 2007 - 00:18:33 CDT)
- Re: question using aggregate function Cimode (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 03:23:17 CDT)
- Re: question using aggregate function Cimode (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 03:24:56 CDT)
I still don't understand whether the term data model... kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 09:11:00 CDT)
- Re: I still don't understand whether the term data model... David Portas (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 15:08:50 CDT)
  - Re: I still don't understand whether the term data model... kaja_love160_at_yahoo.com (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:50:54 CDT)
Fabian Pascal, completely different? Paul Mansour (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 09:20:50 CDT)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 19:48:53 CDT)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 21:28:15 CDT)
    - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 08:27:50 CDT)
      - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 10:35:49 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 10:53:50 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 12:09:15 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:24:18 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:53:38 CDT)
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? David Cressey (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:45:27 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 13:57:13 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? DBMS_Plumber (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 14:04:28 CDT)
      - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Paul Mansour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:47:51 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:20:50 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:00:20 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:31:29 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:55:34 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:31:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:23:13 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:35:54 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:58:53 CDT)
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:15:23 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:35:11 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:48:33 CDT)
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Paul Mansour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:30:07 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:48:01 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:56:44 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Frank Hamersley (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 01:06:08 CDT)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Cimode (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 01:35:35 CDT)
Joins vs. Sub-Selects perryv_at_gmail.com (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 10:18:44 CDT)
- Re: Joins vs. Sub-Selects David Cressey (Thu Jul 19 2007 - 11:47:59 CDT)
OR operator in D&D algebra Vadim Tropashko (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:51:43 CDT)
- Re: OR operator in D&D algebra Vadim Tropashko (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 21:18:48 CDT)
Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Sun Jul 22 2007 - 15:10:39 CDT)
- Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Bob Badour (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:31:15 CDT)
  - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Nis Jørgensen (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 09:43:16 CDT)
    - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Marshall (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 13:34:06 CDT)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements paul c (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:45:37 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements JOG (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:59:25 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:33:14 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:59:16 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 11:15:23 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:44:26 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:30:17 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:37:05 CDT)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:23:59 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Cimode (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 14:38:43 CDT)
        
        Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:22:46 CDT)
- Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Neo (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:22:14 CDT)
  - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:09:12 CDT)
    - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Bob Badour (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 18:52:17 CDT)
      - Re: Object-oriented SQL statements Zorro (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 23:32:10 CDT)
Bachman diagrams and E-R model beginner16 (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 20:01:52 CDT)
What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? beginner16 (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 20:08:30 CDT)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? Bob Badour (Mon Jul 23 2007 - 21:22:14 CDT)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? Alfredo Novoa (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 05:52:32 CDT)
  - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? beginner16 (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:24:20 CDT)
    - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? mAsterdam (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:17:20 CDT)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? David Cressey (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 06:22:22 CDT)
  - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? Jon Heggland (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 07:54:49 CDT)
  - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? beginner16 (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:44:34 CDT)
    - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? David Cressey (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 11:42:09 CDT)
      - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? beginner16 (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:22:56 CDT)
      - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:43:13 CDT)
        
        Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:43:44 CDT)
        
        Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:02:11 CDT)
I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure beginner16 (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 13:27:56 CDT)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure David Cressey (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 15:35:46 CDT)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Gene Wirchenko (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:21:45 CDT)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure David Portas (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 16:36:34 CDT)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 17:03:16 CDT)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bob Badour (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 17:12:27 CDT)
      - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 20:32:08 CDT)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Gene Wirchenko (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 17:19:25 CDT)
      - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 20:32:43 CDT)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 20:13:34 CDT)
      - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:39:47 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 09:38:04 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:16:04 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:21:01 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:56:15 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 12:21:56 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:03:02 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:58:09 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:53:25 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:05:48 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:10:06 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 20:36:22 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 20:54:20 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 22:07:21 CDT)
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 16:24:57 CDT)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure beginner16 (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 17:34:04 CDT)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure David Portas (Tue Jul 24 2007 - 19:10:28 CDT)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:45:28 CDT)
      - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:33:14 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:50:07 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure beginner16 (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:18:09 CDT)
      - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 04:10:52 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 06:01:22 CDT)
        
        Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 06:21:24 CDT)
Help with Design and Obtaining of Data paulwragg2323_at_hotmail.com (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:38:56 CDT)
- Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Neo (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:21:18 CDT)
- Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Evan Keel (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:38:53 CDT)
  - Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Paul (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 04:58:47 CDT)
- Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Martin T. (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 01:40:31 CDT)
Subtyping as an alternative to references Cimode (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:21:36 CDT)
data mining of subsets max (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:01:04 CDT)
- Re: data mining of subsets Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 15:03:27 CDT)
  - Re: data mining of subsets max (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 20:49:20 CDT)
- Re: data mining of subsets Jan Hidders (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 04:44:45 CDT)
How do DBMS handle optimistic locking? Gilles Ganault (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 18:03:26 CDT)
- Re: How do DBMS handle optimistic locking? HansF (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 19:24:05 CDT)
- Re: How do DBMS handle optimistic locking? -CELKO- (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 09:36:57 CDT)
  - Re: How do DBMS handle optimistic locking? Gilles Ganault (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:05:54 CDT)
Sixth normal form Sameeksha (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 05:45:00 CDT)
- Re: Sixth normal form Bob Badour (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:27:17 CDT)
- Re: Sixth normal form Jan Hidders (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 11:30:30 CDT)
  - Re: Sixth normal form Sameeksha (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 23:33:51 CDT)
    - Re: Sixth normal form Jan Hidders (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 03:41:21 CDT)
      - Re: Sixth normal form Bob Badour (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 07:24:00 CDT)
CFP: PODS 2008 Call for Papers lembo_at_dis.uniroma1.it (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 20:20:59 CDT)
Is inner query executed for each row of ... ? beginner16 (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:07:59 CDT)
- Re: Is inner query executed for each row of ... ? kschendel (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 08:15:20 CDT)