Re: Object-oriented SQL statements

From: Zorro <zorabi_at_tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:32:10 -0700
Message-ID: <1185337930.519044.196170_at_b79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>

On Jul 24, 6:52 pm, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Zorro wrote:
> > On Jul 24, 4:22 pm, Neo <neo55..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> [nonsense^2 snipped]
>
>
>
> > Thank you very much for your comment.
> > Regards,
> > Z.
>
> What?!? Everyone gets thanked for their comment except me? I gave you
> the most useful comment of the bunch! Harumph!

Sorry about that. Thanks for your comment, too. However, you commented about some procedural language, so I did not realize you were referring to my question.
A little humor is always good.
Thanks again.
Z. Received on Wed Jul 25 2007 - 06:32:10 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: JOG: "Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object."
Previous message: paul c: "Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure"
In reply to Bob Badour: "Re: Object-oriented SQL statements"
Next in thread: paul c: "Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message