comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:27:39 CDT)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:47:37 CDT)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:51:34 CDT)
- Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:32:19 CDT)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:14:32 CDT)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:23:35 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:47:56 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 10:06:29 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:16:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 11:28:16 CDT)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:48:00 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:18:46 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:15:28 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:38:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 12:34:29 CDT)
  - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 07:46:24 CDT)
    - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 08:33:16 CDT)
      - Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 18:06:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 22:10:54 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 23:13:56 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 10:51:32 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 23:44:07 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 00:43:49 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 01:25:50 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:22:35 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Bob Badour (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:39:37 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 07:18:23 CDT)
        Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*... David Cressey (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 06:13:35 CDT)
        
        Re: Identifying by location -- Was: A pk is *both*... paul c (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 19:57:45 CDT)
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Gene Wirchenko (Mon Jul 30 2007 - 12:07:13 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Tue Jul 31 2007 - 06:58:30 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. David Cressey (Sat Jul 28 2007 - 05:35:36 CDT)
        
        Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. Brian Selzer (Sun Jul 29 2007 - 01:22:27 CDT)
Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object. paul c (Tue Jul 17 2007 - 18:36:03 CDT)
Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Paul Mansour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:47:51 CDT)
- Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:20:50 CDT)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:00:20 CDT)
    - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:31:29 CDT)
      - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 15:55:34 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:31:00 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:23:13 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:35:54 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:58:53 CDT)
      - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:15:23 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:35:11 CDT)
        
        Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 17:48:33 CDT)
  - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Paul Mansour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:30:07 CDT)
    - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bruce C. Baker (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 13:48:01 CDT)
    - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Bob Badour (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 14:56:44 CDT)
      - Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Frank Hamersley (Fri Jul 27 2007 - 01:06:08 CDT)
Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different? Cimode (Fri Jul 20 2007 - 01:35:35 CDT)
Re: Object-oriented SQL statements JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:59:16 CDT)
Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 11:43:13 CDT)
- Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:43:44 CDT)
  - Re: What is that "more" that makes E-R model truly independent ? paul c (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 13:02:11 CDT)
Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Bruce C. Baker (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 20:13:34 CDT)
Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:45:28 CDT)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure David Cressey (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:33:14 CDT)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 07:50:07 CDT)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure beginner16 (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:18:09 CDT)
- Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 04:10:52 CDT)
  - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure JOG (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 06:01:22 CDT)
    - Re: I think my book may be wrong about cardinality, but I'm not sure Cimode (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 06:21:24 CDT)
Help with Design and Obtaining of Data paulwragg2323_at_hotmail.com (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:38:56 CDT)
- Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Neo (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 12:21:18 CDT)
- Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Evan Keel (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 14:38:53 CDT)
  - Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Paul (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 04:58:47 CDT)
- Re: Help with Design and Obtaining of Data Martin T. (Thu Jul 26 2007 - 01:40:31 CDT)
Subtyping as an alternative to references Cimode (Wed Jul 25 2007 - 16:21:36 CDT)