Re: Fabian Pascal, completely different?
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:45:27 GMT
Message-ID: <bp7oi.23$Nf4.12_at_trndny08>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:46a0da67$0$8825$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
> Bruce C. Baker wrote:
>
> > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> > news:46a0b82f$0$8860$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
> >
> >>Bruce C. Baker wrote:
> >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>>To perhaps excessively over-simplify, FP's political postings in
> >>>dbdebunk.com had a decidedly leftist/liberal/anti-GWB slant, while the
> >>>postings on http://fallofknowledgeandreason.blogspot.com/ seem to be
> >>>diametrically the opposite.
> >>
> >>I see no evidence to conclude this. FP posts links to articles as
> >>"evidence for the suicidal decline of the west." I suspect one has to
> >>consider that many of the links are offered in a similar spirit to
> >>http://www.dbdebunk.com/quotes2006.html
> >>
> >>[snip]
> >
> > I'll grant you that FP is concerned about "evidence for the suicidal
decline
> > of the west.", but some of the books he lists at
> > http://www.dbdebunk.com/reading.html DO have a decidedly
> > leftist/liberal/anti-GWB slant. Rock-ribbed conservatives, no matter how
> > concerned for the decline of the west, don't recommend books by Noam
> > Chomsky, f'gosh sakes! :-)
>
> I see no reason to think he is now or ever was a rock-ribbed conservative.
>
>
> > I believe FP was some sort of economist/sociologist before turning his
> > attention to databases.
>
> I believe his background is in 'quantitative behavioural analysis'.
>
>
> > I miss his debunkings, too, but I can sympathize with not wanting to be
> > continuously beaten about the head and shoulders by ignorant idiots.
> >
> > What evidence is there that
http://fallofknowledgeandreason.blogspot.com/ is
> > being maintained by FP, as opposed to being merely linked to by him?
>
> The posts are signed FP and the book list on the blogspot site is
> actually a link to dbdebunk.com
>
> The theme of the blogspot site is consistent with Fabian's opinions as
> stated in the past.
>
> Other than that, there is no evidence whatsoever. What evidence is there
> that anyone other than Fabian maintains
> http://fallofknowledgeandreason.blogspot.com/ ?
At least that's how it looks to me, these days.
But as far as the general decline of reason goes, I think that's been going
on since Alcibiades presuaded more Athenians than Pericles. It just looks
more insane when the topic is current.
Received on Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:45:27 CEST