Re: question using aggregate function

From: David Portas <REMOVE_BEFORE_REPLYING_dportas_at_acm.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:18:06 +0100
Message-ID: <qK-dnSq1DaQHLQDbnZ2dnUVZ8vudnZ2d_at_giganews.com>

"Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message news:kcgni.8420$tj6.3260_at_newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>
>> Have you thought about using a correlated subquery?
>
> No - I haven't thought about using a correlated sub-query? Why complicate
> things?
>

You are right. I think I misread the question.

-- 
David Portas

Received on Wed Jul 18 2007 - 08:18:06 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Roy Hann: "Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object."
Previous message: David Cressey: "Re: question using aggregate function"
Maybe in reply to: Mia: "question using aggregate function"
In reply to Jonathan Leffler: "Re: question using aggregate function"
Next in thread: Roy Hann: "Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message