Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.
From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:09:54 -0000
Message-ID: <1185037794.323144.255480_at_r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
> I'll buy that the truth of a proposition implies the existence of its
> referents, but I'm not too sure about the reverse, and certainly just
> because a proposition is false does not mean that none of its referents
> exist.
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:09:54 -0000
Message-ID: <1185037794.323144.255480_at_r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
On 20 jul, 22:29, "Brian Selzer" <br..._at_selzer-software.com> wrote:
>
> I'll buy that the truth of a proposition implies the existence of its
> referents, but I'm not too sure about the reverse, and certainly just
> because a proposition is false does not mean that none of its referents
> exist.
No argument with that.
- Jan Hidders