Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.

From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:10:26 -0000
Message-ID: <1184281826.871488.141420_at_g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>


On 12 jul, 22:43, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
> Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >That has nothing to do with the lack of proper definitions, but rather
> >with the lack of the will to communicate. If both sides are interested
> >in communicating they will establish a common domain of discourse as
> >soon as they notice that this is lacking. If both sides are not
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ITYM "either side is".

The weaker claim seemed to make my point just as well, and I wanted to avoid a detracting discussion about whether or not there is a high chance of succesful communication if only one is really interested. Sometimes you just can't win. :-)

  • Jan Hidders
Received on Fri Jul 13 2007 - 01:10:26 CEST

Original text of this message