Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: A simple notation, again

Re: A simple notation, again

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:52:38 -0700
Message-ID: <1185285158.353805.7950@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>


On 22 juil, 22:39, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
> David Cressey schreef:
>
> > ... what I'm coming up with is a
> > notation, and not a grammar. Order in a notation does not always imply
> > order in the things denoted.
>
> The thing/denotation distinction very important, and a major
> misunderstanding-generator. So please elaborate clearly
> on this up front when you document the notation.
Agreed. Differentiation between the two aspects is important (Thanks for David for pointing that out) but interdependence between the two aspects seems equally important to me. Received on Tue Jul 24 2007 - 08:52:38 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US