Re: A simple notation, again
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:52:38 -0700
On 22 juil, 22:39, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
> David Cressey schreef:
> > ... what I'm coming up with is a
> > notation, and not a grammar. Order in a notation does not always imply
> > order in the things denoted.
> The thing/denotation distinction very important, and a major
> misunderstanding-generator. So please elaborate clearly
> on this up front when you document the notation.
Agreed. Differentiation between the two aspects is important (Thanks for David for pointing that out) but interdependence between the two aspects seems equally important to me. Received on Tue Jul 24 2007 - 15:52:38 CEST