Re: A pk is *both* a physical and a logical object.

On 13 jul, 06:31, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
> Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 12 jul, 22:43, Gene Wirchenko <ge..._at_ocis.net> wrote:
> >> Jan Hidders <hidd..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> [snip]
>
> >> >That has nothing to do with the lack of proper definitions, but rather
> >> >with the lack of the will to communicate. If both sides are interested
> >> >in communicating they will establish a common domain of discourse as
> >> >soon as they notice that this is lacking. If both sides are not
>
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> ITYM "either side is".
>
> >The weaker claim seemed to make my point just as well, and I wanted to
> >avoid a detracting discussion about whether or not there is a high
> >chance of succesful communication if only one is really interested.
> >Sometimes you just can't win. :-)
>
> It was a stronger claim. It takes but one weasel to confuse
> conmmunication. (Just try reading what some marketroids put out.)

Are you sure you are not deliberately misunderstanding me? ;-)

• Jan Hidders