Oracle FAQ
Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?jscript"> </SCRIPT> <NOSCRIPT> <A HREF="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?banner=NonSSI;page=01" TARGET="_blank" onMouseOver="window.status='Click here! Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors.';return true" onMouseOut="window.status='';return true"> <IMG SRC="http://www.orafaq.com/cgi-bin/ads/ads.pl?page=01" HEIGHT=60 WIDTH=468 ALT="Support the Oracle FAQ by supporting our sponsors. Click here!" BORDER=0> </A> </NOSCRIPT>
Home
->
Community
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
567 messages
:
Starting
Tue May 01 2007 - 00:23:17 CDT,
Ending
Thu May 31 2007 - 22:48:52 CDT
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Marshall
(Tue May 01 2007 - 00:23:17 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 02:26:51 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue May 01 2007 - 11:15:19 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 13:25:43 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 02:29:52 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 02:41:01 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 01 2007 - 08:55:04 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 09:11:22 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 01 2007 - 13:10:38 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 13:29:45 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 01 2007 - 18:17:03 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 02 2007 - 05:18:23 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Wed May 02 2007 - 07:04:44 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed May 02 2007 - 11:07:29 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Wed May 02 2007 - 12:25:10 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 02 2007 - 14:30:48 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Wed May 02 2007 - 14:59:13 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 01:23:29 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Wed May 02 2007 - 13:25:51 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 08:53:45 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 11:16:23 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Wed May 02 2007 - 13:27:10 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Wed May 02 2007 - 14:47:50 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Wed May 02 2007 - 15:37:25 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 01:39:04 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 02:27:44 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 05:05:54 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 06:42:31 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:52:07 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:16:54 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:13:39 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:31:07 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:40:17 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 12:26:06 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 12:44:38 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:13:02 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:24:56 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:20:06 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:23:43 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:09:43 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:30:31 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:30:45 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:43:03 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:04:34 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:38:12 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:51:02 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 01:36:40 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:02:44 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:21:59 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:45:42 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:56:10 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:04:00 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:36:52 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 19:35:44 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 01:34:54 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 04 2007 - 07:27:54 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 11:50:56 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 05 2007 - 04:42:28 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 07:27:53 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Sat May 05 2007 - 08:06:51 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 08:17:52 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 09:56:02 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 09:53:56 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 12:30:04 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 13:21:35 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 05 2007 - 14:31:40 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 14:54:48 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 12:01:52 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:07:14 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 02:12:08 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 02:36:00 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 05:13:13 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 06:09:45 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:24:54 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:44:04 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:19:10 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:28:47 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:52:05 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:55:47 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:59:51 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:11:48 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:47:21 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 19:09:54 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 02:13:49 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 05:36:30 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:53:35 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 01:41:14 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 01:58:28 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 04:56:20 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Christopher Browne
(Mon May 07 2007 - 07:34:42 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 08 2007 - 02:35:33 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Tue May 01 2007 - 14:44:45 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
DBMS_Plumber
(Tue May 01 2007 - 15:31:58 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 15:58:10 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Tue May 01 2007 - 16:24:51 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Wed May 02 2007 - 05:05:04 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Wed May 02 2007 - 05:17:22 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Wed May 02 2007 - 14:07:15 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 20:44:26 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 01:33:06 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 03:12:51 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 04:33:32 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Kevin Kirkpatrick
(Thu May 03 2007 - 06:41:25 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 06:53:07 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Kevin Kirkpatrick
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:45:36 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:00:09 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:22:28 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:58:47 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Tue May 01 2007 - 16:27:33 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
TroyK
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:45:04 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 01:44:43 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Alvin Ryder
(Thu May 03 2007 - 22:40:20 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 01:40:45 CDT)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Alvin Ryder
(Mon May 07 2007 - 20:47:50 CDT)
Newbie question about design
idaku2_at_gmail.com
(Tue May 01 2007 - 04:29:11 CDT)
Re: Newbie question about design
Bob Badour
(Tue May 01 2007 - 08:04:25 CDT)
Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
David Cressey
(Tue May 01 2007 - 07:49:40 CDT)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:22:40 CDT)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:55:00 CDT)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:39:14 CDT)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:09:45 CDT)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:31:52 CDT)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:56:27 CDT)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Bob Hairgrove
(Thu May 17 2007 - 10:55:13 CDT)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 17 2007 - 16:44:31 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Ed Prochak
(Tue May 01 2007 - 21:45:35 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Wed May 02 2007 - 04:55:23 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
-CELKO-
(Wed May 02 2007 - 14:29:01 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Wed May 02 2007 - 15:26:51 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 07:10:44 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:51:58 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:58:38 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:24:28 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
-CELKO-
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:40:59 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:17:45 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:05:06 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:23:23 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:32:29 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:58:42 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 19:04:09 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Thu May 03 2007 - 19:10:41 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 19:17:11 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 20:02:38 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 22:17:04 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Christopher Browne
(Mon May 07 2007 - 07:51:22 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Tue May 08 2007 - 07:13:50 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:02:10 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:14:20 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 23:56:36 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:10:10 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 06:59:19 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Fri May 04 2007 - 07:30:15 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 10:36:50 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 10:59:58 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 07:57:10 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 08:16:04 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 11:38:31 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 13:13:01 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Sat May 05 2007 - 10:10:07 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Sat May 05 2007 - 11:34:25 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 12:02:32 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Sat May 05 2007 - 14:03:33 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 13:20:23 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 13:25:56 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 13:49:39 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Sun May 06 2007 - 16:59:14 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:04:38 CDT)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Alvin Ryder
(Thu May 03 2007 - 23:05:09 CDT)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Ed Prochak
(Tue May 01 2007 - 22:17:46 CDT)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Bob Badour
(Tue May 01 2007 - 22:35:10 CDT)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed May 02 2007 - 11:05:22 CDT)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Volker Hetzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 14:06:38 CDT)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Marshall
(Wed May 02 2007 - 14:49:28 CDT)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
David Cressey
(Wed May 02 2007 - 15:32:01 CDT)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Bob Badour
(Wed May 02 2007 - 16:51:46 CDT)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Marshall
(Wed May 02 2007 - 22:53:04 CDT)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 04:49:04 CDT)
more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Wed May 02 2007 - 15:13:21 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Wed May 02 2007 - 15:17:58 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Wed May 02 2007 - 19:49:18 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:39:29 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:30:10 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 09:25:19 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 14:52:07 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 19:53:18 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 02:36:35 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sat May 05 2007 - 10:28:06 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 11:39:35 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sat May 05 2007 - 10:50:25 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sat May 05 2007 - 13:57:02 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 14:40:01 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Sat May 05 2007 - 15:07:36 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sat May 05 2007 - 15:17:35 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 16:23:11 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sun May 06 2007 - 01:51:54 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Sun May 06 2007 - 04:57:11 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 07 2007 - 01:03:30 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sun May 06 2007 - 11:49:54 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sun May 06 2007 - 12:11:15 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sun May 06 2007 - 12:21:11 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Sun May 06 2007 - 14:30:19 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sun May 06 2007 - 12:12:23 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 07 2007 - 08:36:23 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Mon May 07 2007 - 22:09:37 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 08 2007 - 03:58:24 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:37:18 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Fri May 04 2007 - 14:16:59 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sat May 05 2007 - 09:21:01 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sat May 05 2007 - 10:46:43 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Sat May 05 2007 - 10:00:25 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 12:04:32 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sat May 05 2007 - 13:51:48 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 06 2007 - 01:32:42 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Sun May 06 2007 - 07:40:46 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 06 2007 - 22:37:25 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Sun May 06 2007 - 07:53:58 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Sun May 06 2007 - 21:52:46 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 07 2007 - 00:56:32 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Mon May 07 2007 - 02:34:16 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 11:48:45 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Tue May 08 2007 - 07:59:52 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 07 2007 - 01:21:02 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 02:25:30 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 07 2007 - 06:15:57 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 13:27:54 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 15:12:03 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 20:53:31 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Tue May 08 2007 - 13:59:58 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Tue May 08 2007 - 16:26:16 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 09 2007 - 04:21:56 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Wed May 09 2007 - 12:52:01 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 10 2007 - 01:20:42 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Thu May 10 2007 - 15:46:58 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 10 2007 - 18:30:44 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Thu May 10 2007 - 20:25:55 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 10 2007 - 23:37:45 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 10 2007 - 11:32:32 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 10 2007 - 11:42:32 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 10 2007 - 11:55:45 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 10 2007 - 12:10:51 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Thu May 10 2007 - 23:31:34 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri May 11 2007 - 10:56:44 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Fri May 11 2007 - 05:18:00 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri May 11 2007 - 11:09:26 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sat May 12 2007 - 03:31:03 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 12 2007 - 11:43:12 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Thu May 10 2007 - 15:53:02 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Fri May 11 2007 - 06:03:33 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Fri May 11 2007 - 09:30:27 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sat May 12 2007 - 03:55:48 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sat May 12 2007 - 10:06:34 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Thu May 10 2007 - 22:10:30 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Thu May 10 2007 - 23:27:14 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 19:05:55 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:50:19 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:26:57 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:46:37 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:42:29 CDT)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:45:22 CDT)
Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 08:29:29 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 05 2007 - 09:51:36 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 11:59:14 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 05 2007 - 13:51:06 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 05 2007 - 12:06:52 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 14:53:25 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 06 2007 - 01:30:01 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 06 2007 - 22:27:48 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Wed May 09 2007 - 08:00:10 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 09 2007 - 11:15:01 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 09 2007 - 11:58:07 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 09 2007 - 15:56:02 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Fri May 11 2007 - 16:07:58 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 11 2007 - 19:58:50 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 12 2007 - 07:14:35 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Bob Badour
(Sat May 12 2007 - 07:22:30 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 12 2007 - 08:20:54 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 13 2007 - 01:21:29 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 13 2007 - 04:50:28 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 13 2007 - 16:47:48 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 14 2007 - 16:38:11 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 12 2007 - 17:30:00 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 12 2007 - 10:00:47 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 12 2007 - 20:40:01 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Thu May 17 2007 - 08:49:51 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 17 2007 - 17:23:15 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Mon May 14 2007 - 15:31:39 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Kevin Kirkpatrick
(Sat May 05 2007 - 12:30:12 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Bob Badour
(Sat May 05 2007 - 15:14:52 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri May 11 2007 - 17:50:19 CDT)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri May 11 2007 - 17:59:54 CDT)
Generating binary and ternary trees in teh neste4d sets model
-CELKO-
(Mon May 07 2007 - 14:40:14 CDT)
how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
ErkanY
(Wed May 09 2007 - 11:12:51 CDT)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
Cimode
(Wed May 09 2007 - 11:58:43 CDT)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
ErkanY
(Wed May 09 2007 - 13:57:47 CDT)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
Cimode
(Thu May 10 2007 - 03:02:29 CDT)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
David Cressey
(Thu May 10 2007 - 03:11:40 CDT)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
kerad
(Thu May 10 2007 - 17:03:29 CDT)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
-CELKO-
(Thu May 10 2007 - 12:53:33 CDT)
Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri May 11 2007 - 12:56:58 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Marshall
(Tue May 29 2007 - 16:47:59 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 30 2007 - 01:27:19 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Wed May 30 2007 - 11:18:33 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Marshall
(Wed May 30 2007 - 22:52:59 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 31 2007 - 11:28:48 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 17:55:15 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
V.J. Kumar
(Thu May 31 2007 - 20:40:22 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 20:57:35 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 31 2007 - 13:25:45 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 31 2007 - 20:55:54 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 31 2007 - 22:11:48 CDT)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 31 2007 - 22:23:04 CDT)
set builder notation for relational division
Marshall
(Sun May 13 2007 - 11:18:42 CDT)
Re: set builder notation for relational division
Vadim Tropashko
(Mon May 14 2007 - 12:28:42 CDT)
Re: set builder notation for relational division
Vadim Tropashko
(Mon May 14 2007 - 12:39:33 CDT)
Isolation levels
Razvan Socol
(Tue May 15 2007 - 10:15:56 CDT)
Re: Isolation levels
Bob Badour
(Tue May 15 2007 - 13:41:33 CDT)
Re: Isolation levels
Lee Fesperman
(Thu May 17 2007 - 13:10:23 CDT)
Re: Isolation levels
V.J. Kumar
(Wed May 16 2007 - 07:41:19 CDT)
Re: Isolation levels
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 16 2007 - 07:57:49 CDT)
Re: Isolation levels
Razvan Socol
(Sat May 19 2007 - 12:13:17 CDT)
CFP: WWW/Internet 2007 - Portugal
natty2006_at_gmail.com
(Tue May 15 2007 - 11:10:57 CDT)
bags vs. sets
Marshall
(Tue May 15 2007 - 16:20:37 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
Bob Badour
(Tue May 15 2007 - 17:38:17 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue May 15 2007 - 18:45:39 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
Bob Badour
(Tue May 15 2007 - 20:21:30 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue May 15 2007 - 20:29:45 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
David Cressey
(Wed May 16 2007 - 05:34:30 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
Bob Badour
(Wed May 16 2007 - 06:05:18 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
Gene Wirchenko
(Tue May 15 2007 - 18:48:15 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
David Cressey
(Tue May 15 2007 - 19:57:57 CDT)
Re: bags vs. sets
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 16 2007 - 01:38:34 CDT)
Comparing two Oracle Databases
kalai
(Tue May 15 2007 - 23:47:58 CDT)
Re: Comparing two Oracle Databases
Harm Olthof
(Wed May 16 2007 - 02:06:52 CDT)
two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
artev
(Thu May 17 2007 - 14:05:18 CDT)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
Lennart
(Thu May 17 2007 - 14:26:00 CDT)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
Ed Prochak
(Thu May 17 2007 - 14:29:27 CDT)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 17 2007 - 15:59:52 CDT)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
artev
(Fri May 18 2007 - 07:41:10 CDT)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
Ed Prochak
(Tue May 22 2007 - 13:09:15 CDT)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
Bob Badour
(Tue May 22 2007 - 15:04:45 CDT)
naive questions about nested intervals with Farey fractions
blacksqr
(Fri May 18 2007 - 03:20:54 CDT)
Re: naive questions about nested intervals with Farey fractions
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri May 18 2007 - 11:10:24 CDT)
Databasescheme with UML
Christian Bruckhoff
(Fri May 18 2007 - 05:03:53 CDT)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Bob Badour
(Fri May 18 2007 - 09:03:12 CDT)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Goran Mandinic
(Wed May 23 2007 - 02:06:17 CDT)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 23 2007 - 02:28:10 CDT)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Eric
(Wed May 23 2007 - 13:56:03 CDT)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Goran Mandinic
(Tue May 29 2007 - 06:01:24 CDT)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Jon Heggland
(Tue May 29 2007 - 07:25:32 CDT)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
dawn
(Fri May 25 2007 - 08:23:22 CDT)
GROUP BY
Marshall
(Fri May 18 2007 - 13:32:46 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Bob Badour
(Fri May 18 2007 - 13:48:34 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
David Cressey
(Fri May 18 2007 - 14:31:26 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Marshall
(Fri May 18 2007 - 21:19:20 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
David Cressey
(Sat May 19 2007 - 09:01:51 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Gene Wirchenko
(Fri May 18 2007 - 14:42:09 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
paul c
(Fri May 18 2007 - 20:35:40 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Marshall
(Fri May 18 2007 - 21:13:38 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 19 2007 - 09:38:41 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Marshall
(Sat May 19 2007 - 13:05:32 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Bob Badour
(Sat May 19 2007 - 14:21:03 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 19 2007 - 19:37:28 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 19 2007 - 19:57:39 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 19 2007 - 17:37:08 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Gene Wirchenko
(Sat May 19 2007 - 21:12:31 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
David Portas
(Sat May 19 2007 - 02:16:47 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Sat May 19 2007 - 09:20:01 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Lennart
(Sat May 19 2007 - 09:31:50 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Sat May 19 2007 - 09:52:15 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Lennart
(Sun May 20 2007 - 08:05:03 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Sun May 20 2007 - 13:02:19 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Lennart
(Sun May 20 2007 - 13:19:07 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Sun May 20 2007 - 18:24:07 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Sun May 20 2007 - 19:55:20 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Lennart
(Mon May 21 2007 - 02:17:08 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
David Portas
(Sat May 19 2007 - 17:04:56 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 19 2007 - 13:02:53 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Bob Badour
(Sat May 19 2007 - 14:23:19 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 19 2007 - 16:20:16 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 19 2007 - 16:38:18 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
Bob Badour
(Sat May 19 2007 - 17:55:32 CDT)
Re: GROUP BY
David Cressey
(Sat May 19 2007 - 09:08:04 CDT)
Question about "linking tables"
Kevin Porter
(Sat May 19 2007 - 00:01:01 CDT)
Re: Question about "linking tables"
Bob Stearns
(Sat May 19 2007 - 00:51:09 CDT)
Re: Question about "linking tables"
Kevin Porter
(Sat May 19 2007 - 01:24:04 CDT)
Re: Question about "linking tables"
David Cressey
(Sat May 19 2007 - 05:46:41 CDT)
Re: Question about "linking tables"
Bob Badour
(Sat May 19 2007 - 11:03:31 CDT)
Re: Question about "linking tables"
Neo
(Fri May 25 2007 - 09:35:18 CDT)
constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Marshall
(Sun May 20 2007 - 01:00:04 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 20 2007 - 10:33:03 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Sun May 20 2007 - 23:08:41 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Sun May 20 2007 - 23:14:42 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 20 2007 - 23:47:36 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Mon May 21 2007 - 00:10:01 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
David Portas
(Mon May 21 2007 - 01:04:53 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 21 2007 - 17:26:38 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Mon May 21 2007 - 18:58:11 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 21 2007 - 21:32:18 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Tue May 22 2007 - 20:01:07 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 00:52:34 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 09:27:38 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 11:26:55 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 19:33:23 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Bob Badour
(Wed May 23 2007 - 22:17:50 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 22:33:58 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 24 2007 - 00:56:30 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 22:33:58 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Vadim Tropashko
(Mon May 21 2007 - 13:35:34 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Sat May 26 2007 - 09:27:59 CDT)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Sat May 26 2007 - 22:10:48 CDT)
JOB POSTING: Looking for a senior database manager /department head/ architecture
ezduffy_at_gmail.com
(Sun May 20 2007 - 20:10:25 CDT)
Re: JOB POSTING: Looking for a senior database manager /department head/ architecture
Jan M. Nelken
(Sun May 20 2007 - 21:37:39 CDT)
Little design mistakes that can easily be avoided (1): Concatenated keys and addition of columns
Cimode
(Tue May 22 2007 - 08:26:01 CDT)
Stupid Database Tricks (was: Little Design Mistakes)
David Cressey
(Tue May 22 2007 - 09:47:33 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks (was: Little Design Mistakes)
Cimode
(Tue May 22 2007 - 12:21:51 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks (was: Little Design Mistakes)
Gene Wirchenko
(Tue May 22 2007 - 13:16:26 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Bob Badour
(Tue May 22 2007 - 15:48:09 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Marshall
(Tue May 22 2007 - 22:59:20 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Gene Wirchenko
(Tue May 22 2007 - 23:08:49 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Wed May 23 2007 - 02:24:36 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 03:41:56 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 10:35:27 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
David Cressey
(Wed May 23 2007 - 04:48:20 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Wed May 23 2007 - 05:51:53 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
David Cressey
(Wed May 23 2007 - 09:46:13 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
daveb
(Wed May 23 2007 - 12:23:44 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
hasta_l3_at_hotmail.com
(Wed May 23 2007 - 13:56:07 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Bob Badour
(Wed May 23 2007 - 10:27:39 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
DBMS_Plumber
(Wed May 23 2007 - 13:27:55 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
DBMS_Plumber
(Wed May 23 2007 - 13:28:13 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
-CELKO-
(Thu May 24 2007 - 21:10:23 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
David Cressey
(Thu May 24 2007 - 23:30:29 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Fri May 25 2007 - 02:38:53 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
David Cressey
(Fri May 25 2007 - 07:51:00 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Gene Wirchenko
(Fri May 25 2007 - 11:13:15 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 06:00:25 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Wed May 23 2007 - 06:37:43 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 08:38:49 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Wed May 23 2007 - 09:57:04 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 10:20:46 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Bob Badour
(Wed May 23 2007 - 09:21:28 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 10:06:36 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 11:45:48 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
hasta_l3_at_hotmail.com
(Wed May 23 2007 - 02:16:36 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 03:40:13 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 03:40:43 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Bob Badour
(Wed May 23 2007 - 10:20:49 CDT)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
hasta_l3_at_hotmail.com
(Wed May 23 2007 - 11:44:59 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can easily be avoided (1): Concatenated keys and addition of columns
Gene Wirchenko
(Tue May 22 2007 - 13:13:18 CDT)
Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (1): Concatenated Keys and Addition of Attributes
Cimode
(Tue May 22 2007 - 11:01:34 CDT)
Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Cimode
(Thu May 24 2007 - 02:58:51 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
David Cressey
(Thu May 24 2007 - 05:58:48 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Cimode
(Thu May 24 2007 - 06:40:00 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
David Cressey
(Thu May 24 2007 - 07:33:40 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Cimode
(Thu May 24 2007 - 07:46:08 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 24 2007 - 11:27:14 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
DBMS_Plumber
(Thu May 24 2007 - 13:14:40 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Cimode
(Thu May 24 2007 - 13:27:43 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 26 2007 - 10:14:14 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 26 2007 - 14:22:56 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
David Cressey
(Thu May 24 2007 - 18:31:31 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
paul c
(Thu May 24 2007 - 20:04:20 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
paul c
(Thu May 24 2007 - 20:07:45 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 24 2007 - 21:34:48 CDT)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
-CELKO-
(Fri May 25 2007 - 09:04:48 CDT)
Looking for Employee data model
Shayne
(Fri May 25 2007 - 10:15:48 CDT)
Re: Looking for Employee data model
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 17:30:02 CDT)
Re: Looking for Employee data model
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 10:03:05 CDT)
Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sat May 26 2007 - 10:26:28 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sat May 26 2007 - 11:18:58 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sat May 26 2007 - 12:29:13 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sat May 26 2007 - 17:06:55 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 03:27:37 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 06:43:56 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 27 2007 - 07:19:30 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 18:14:49 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 27 2007 - 19:39:25 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 04:32:35 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 28 2007 - 15:31:08 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Tue May 29 2007 - 10:09:48 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
daveb
(Tue May 29 2007 - 20:03:42 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 30 2007 - 01:50:44 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sat May 26 2007 - 17:11:54 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sat May 26 2007 - 17:58:03 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sat May 26 2007 - 18:16:34 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bruce C. Baker
(Sat May 26 2007 - 19:42:59 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sat May 26 2007 - 20:23:02 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bruce C. Baker
(Sat May 26 2007 - 22:01:32 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sat May 26 2007 - 22:27:00 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bruce C. Baker
(Sat May 26 2007 - 22:54:07 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sat May 26 2007 - 23:44:25 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bruce C. Baker
(Sun May 27 2007 - 00:34:28 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 12:48:20 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 09:07:09 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 09:06:01 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 09:04:31 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
DBMS_Plumber
(Wed May 30 2007 - 12:21:48 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 03:29:40 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 10:42:16 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Sun May 27 2007 - 15:33:46 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 17:31:16 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 18:55:34 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 27 2007 - 21:13:12 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Mon May 28 2007 - 04:20:12 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Keith H Duggar
(Mon May 28 2007 - 13:25:55 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue May 29 2007 - 06:18:09 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Larry Coon
(Thu May 31 2007 - 15:22:26 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 09:12:36 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 09:23:19 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Mon May 28 2007 - 15:22:53 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Alfredo Novoa
(Sun May 27 2007 - 17:40:09 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 18:13:17 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon May 28 2007 - 02:03:36 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listening to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bert Blink
(Mon May 28 2007 - 04:44:40 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listening to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Mon May 28 2007 - 15:13:59 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
daveb
(Tue May 29 2007 - 18:16:13 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Tue May 29 2007 - 18:27:34 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Mon May 28 2007 - 04:32:05 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 04:33:54 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Mon May 28 2007 - 13:38:42 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 14:01:57 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Mon May 28 2007 - 14:32:28 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sat May 26 2007 - 22:16:28 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 02:58:27 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 07:23:15 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
David Cressey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 07:58:24 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Roy Hann
(Sun May 27 2007 - 08:28:26 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 07:54:47 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 08:58:45 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 09:41:41 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Marshall
(Sun May 27 2007 - 10:53:57 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 28 2007 - 04:44:34 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 10:07:25 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon May 28 2007 - 11:22:33 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 28 2007 - 14:16:37 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Tue May 29 2007 - 03:54:59 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 29 2007 - 06:48:42 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 09:34:42 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 09:08:13 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 09:48:21 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sun May 27 2007 - 10:57:07 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 15:41:43 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sun May 27 2007 - 20:38:22 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 03:20:06 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 03:28:50 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 14:52:37 CDT)
Quod est veritas
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 08:57:33 CDT)
Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (3): Qualifying as relation *any* predicate
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 09:21:03 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (3): Qualifying as relation *any* predicate
DM Unseen
(Tue May 29 2007 - 03:20:15 CDT)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (3): Qualifying as relation *any* predicate
Cimode
(Tue May 29 2007 - 03:51:14 CDT)
From class diagram to physical data model : conceptual data model or not ?
zejeanmi_at_gmail.com
(Tue May 29 2007 - 10:53:43 CDT)
Re: From class diagram to physical data model : conceptual data model or not ?
Cimode
(Thu May 31 2007 - 14:54:48 CDT)
Book recall
-CELKO-
(Tue May 29 2007 - 13:12:52 CDT)
Re: Book recall
daveb
(Tue May 29 2007 - 20:18:44 CDT)
Re: Book recall
Bob Badour
(Tue May 29 2007 - 20:37:15 CDT)
Re: Book recall
-CELKO-
(Wed May 30 2007 - 08:33:50 CDT)
Re: Book recall
David Cressey
(Wed May 30 2007 - 08:59:48 CDT)
Re: Book recall
-CELKO-
(Wed May 30 2007 - 12:38:49 CDT)
Re: Book recall
Bob Badour
(Wed May 30 2007 - 16:46:45 CDT)
Complement in Relational Lattice
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 17:36:17 CDT)
Re: Complement in Relational Lattice
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 18:09:47 CDT)
Re: Complement in Relational Lattice
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 19:35:44 CDT)
Re: Complement in Relational Lattice
paul c
(Thu May 31 2007 - 20:58:36 CDT)
Re: Complement in Relational Lattice
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 22:48:52 CDT)
Re: Complement in Relational Lattice
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 31 2007 - 18:37:26 CDT)
Re: Complement in Relational Lattice
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 19:26:57 CDT)
Re: Complement in Relational Lattice
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 21:32:36 CDT)
Last message date
:
Thu May 31 2007 - 22:48:52 CDT
Archived on
: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 16:56:43 CDT
567 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
HOME
|
ASK QUESTION
|
ADD INFO
|
SEARCH
|
E-MAIL US
