Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation

From: Brian Selzer <brian_at_selzer-software.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 02:51:02 GMT
Message-ID: <qcx_h.20059$JZ3.8915_at_newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>


"Cimode" <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1178221092.312391.102390_at_o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On 3 mai, 21:04, "Brian Selzer" <b..._at_selzer-software.com> wrote:
>> "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
>> So, if there is no such thing as "missing information," then how can
>> there
>> be systematic treatment of it?
> Are you really sure about that?
>

Don't get me wrong. I like the idea of interpolation. But in a closed world, what would the interpolated values be approximations of? How do you reconcile that a value should exist but doesn't and thus needs to be approximated with the closed world assumption which requires that whenever a value should exist, it must exist? Received on Fri May 04 2007 - 04:51:02 CEST

Original text of this message