Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation

On 4 mai, 04:51, "Brian Selzer" <b..._at_selzer-software.com> wrote:
> "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1178221092.312391.102390_at_o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On 3 mai, 21:04, "Brian Selzer" <b..._at_selzer-software.com> wrote:
> >> "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >> So, if there is no such thing as "missing information," then how can
> >> there
> >> be systematic treatment of it?
> > Are you really sure about that?
>
> Don't get me wrong. I like the idea of interpolation. But in a closed
> world, what would the interpolated values be approximations of?
As written in the subject, numerical series.

> How do you reconcile that a value should exist but doesn't and thus needs to be
> approximated with the closed world assumption which requires that whenever a
> value should exist, it must exist?
I am sorry but I can not make sense of this sentence. Received on Fri May 04 2007 - 08:36:40 CEST