Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio

From: Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 12:22:40 GMT
Message-ID: <kuk_h.33204$M.16081_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>

David Cressey wrote:
> Bob mentioned that the signal to noise ratio in this newsgroup is improving.
> I share that perception.

This true IMO ... however I am getting slightly cheesed off by long multi threaded posts - not that I was previously blameless.

Whilst I am a confirmed "bottom poster" I hanker for 1 quote + 1 response in 30 or so lines max.

Yeah yeah - its very 21st century (gnats attention span) even though I am notionally a boomer but I like the fast aquisition by leaning on the downarrow rather than having to page down to find the meat 'n potatoes.

Cheers, Frank. Received on Thu May 03 2007 - 14:22:40 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian Selzer: "Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation"
Previous message: Brian Selzer: "Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation"
In reply to: David Cressey: "Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio"
In reply to David Cressey: "Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio"
Next in thread: paul c: "Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio"
Reply: paul c: "Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message