Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:23:02 -0300
Message-ID: <4658dd25$0$4028$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net>
Bruce C. Baker wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:4658bf81$0$4043$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
>
>>Matthias Klaey wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Matthias Klaey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Chapter 2 of the little things that can be done at little cost to
>>>>>>avoid misconceptions about RM design.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Lately, I opened a thread that gave opportunity for CELKO to post the
>>>>>>exact essence of what should *not* be done in design: let
>>>>>>subjectiveness regulate design instead of logic. I take the
>>>>>>opportunity of his thread to point out how and why it is wiser to
>>>>>>ignore such ideas to build better databases. For that I will take all
>>>>>>the posted comments and try to make sense out of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Regard...
>>>>>
>>>>>[...]
>>>>>
>>>>>Hmm. Is this just the usual Celko-bashing in this newsgroup? Did you
>>>>>intend to write a parody on how to misread and misinterpert other
>>>>>peoples texts? You don't mean this seriously, do you?
>>>>
>>>>Celko is an idiot who need debunking everywhere. You seem to object to
>>>>debunking idiots.
>>>
>>>"Celko is an idiot who need debunking everywhere": This is *your
>>>opinion* about Celko. I happen to disagree with you (end of *this*
>>>discussion from my part).
>>
>>That Celko is an idiot is a factual matter and not opinion at all.
> > For those of us who are coming a little late to the "Celko is an idiot" > thread, could you give a few details about the dimensions of his idiocy? > TIA.
groups.google.com Received on Sun May 27 2007 - 03:23:02 CEST