Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)

"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:4658bf81$0$4043$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
> Matthias Klaey wrote:
>
>> Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Matthias Klaey wrote:
>>>
>>>>Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>Chapter 2 of the little things that can be done at little cost to
>>>>>avoid misconceptions about RM design.
>>>>>
>>>>>Lately, I opened a thread that gave opportunity for CELKO to post the
>>>>>exact essence of what should *not* be done in design: let
>>>>>subjectiveness regulate design instead of logic. I take the
>>>>>opportunity of his thread to point out how and why it is wiser to
>>>>>ignore such ideas to build better databases. For that I will take all
>>>>>the posted comments and try to make sense out of them.
>>>>>
>>>>>Regard...
>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>
>>>>Hmm. Is this just the usual Celko-bashing in this newsgroup? Did you
>>>>intend to write a parody on how to misread and misinterpert other
>>>>peoples texts? You don't mean this seriously, do you?
>>>
>>>Celko is an idiot who need debunking everywhere. You seem to object to
>>>debunking idiots.
>>
>> "Celko is an idiot who need debunking everywhere": This is *your
>> opinion* about Celko. I happen to disagree with you (end of *this*
>> discussion from my part).
>
> That Celko is an idiot is a factual matter and not opinion at all.

For those of us who are coming a little late to the "Celko is an idiot" thread, could you give a few details about the dimensions of his idiocy? TIA. Received on Sun May 27 2007 - 02:42:59 CEST