Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)

On 27 mai, 02:42, "Bruce C. Baker" <b..._at_undisclosedlocation.net> wrote:
> "Bob Badour" <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>
> news:4658bf81$0$4043$9a566e8b_at_news.aliant.net...
>
>
>
> > Matthias Klaey wrote:
>
> >> Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >>>Matthias Klaey wrote:
>
> >>>>Cimode <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Hi,
>
> >>>>>Chapter 2 of the little things that can be done at little cost to
> >>>>>avoid misconceptions about RM design.
>
> >>>>>Lately, I opened a thread that gave opportunity for CELKO to post the
> >>>>>exact essence of what should *not* be done in design: let
> >>>>>subjectiveness regulate design instead of logic. I take the
> >>>>>opportunity of his thread to point out how and why it is wiser to
> >>>>>ignore such ideas to build better databases. For that I will take all
> >>>>>the posted comments and try to make sense out of them.
>
> >>>>>Regard...
>
> >>>>[...]
>
> >>>>Hmm. Is this just the usual Celko-bashing in this newsgroup? Did you
> >>>>intend to write a parody on how to misread and misinterpert other
> >>>>peoples texts? You don't mean this seriously, do you?
>
> >>>Celko is an idiot who need debunking everywhere. You seem to object to
> >>>debunking idiots.
>
> >> "Celko is an idiot who need debunking everywhere": This is *your
> >> opinion* about Celko. I happen to disagree with you (end of *this*
> >> discussion from my part).
>
> > That Celko is an idiot is a factual matter and not opinion at all.
>
> For those of us who are coming a little late to the "Celko is an idiot"
> thread, could you give a few details about the dimensions of his idiocy?
> TIA.
Huhh ?...I was convinced idiocy was monodimensional? Received on Sun May 27 2007 - 10:29:40 CEST