Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
From: Vadim Tropashko <vadimtro_invalid_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 1 May 2007 09:15:19 -0700
Message-ID: <1178036119.549724.308760_at_q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
1 1
2 4
3 9
Date: 1 May 2007 09:15:19 -0700
Message-ID: <1178036119.549724.308760_at_q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
On May 1, 12:26 am, Cimode <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> My belief (and hope) would be that using interpolation
> could represent a method more *systematic* (and therefore more easy to
> program in a dbms) to handle missing information.
One more observation. Interpolation, regression
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_analysis
, prediction, and tons of other stuff from infamous AI arena are all technically a join. Consider a "learning" set
X Y
1 1
2 4
3 9
and a set of unknown values
X
-- 4 5 7 for which the system is requiered to predict the Y values. "Obviously" the answer in this rather unsophisticated example is X Y ----- 1 1 2 4 3 9 4 16 5 25 7 49 The left outer join between the learning set and the set of unknowns is the mother of all prediction methods that just guesses all the unknown Y values to the NULLs: X Y ----- 1 1 2 4 3 9 4 NULL 5 NULL 7 NULL Therefore, prediction operation is technically some sort of a join.Received on Tue May 01 2007 - 18:15:19 CEST