Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by thread
comp.databases.theory: by thread
21 messages
:
Starting
Tue May 01 2007 - 07:23:17 CEST,
Ending
Tue May 01 2007 - 04:51:23 CEST
This period
:
Most recent messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue May 01 2007 - 01:42:42 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 01 2007 - 04:49:11 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Tue May 01 2007 - 04:51:23 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Marshall
(Tue May 01 2007 - 07:23:17 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 09:26:51 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Vadim Tropashko
(Tue May 01 2007 - 18:15:19 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 20:25:43 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 09:29:52 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 09:41:01 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 01 2007 - 15:55:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 16:11:22 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 01 2007 - 20:10:38 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 20:29:45 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Tue May 01 2007 - 21:44:45 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
DBMS_Plumber
(Tue May 01 2007 - 22:31:58 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 01 2007 - 22:58:10 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Tue May 01 2007 - 23:24:51 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Tue May 01 2007 - 23:27:33 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 01:17:03 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 02 2007 - 12:18:23 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Wed May 02 2007 - 14:04:44 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Ed Prochak
(Wed May 02 2007 - 05:17:46 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Bob Badour
(Wed May 02 2007 - 05:35:10 CEST)
Re: newsgroup for asking general SQL questions?
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed May 02 2007 - 18:05:22 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Wed May 02 2007 - 12:05:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Wed May 02 2007 - 12:17:22 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Wed May 02 2007 - 21:07:15 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 15:53:45 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed May 02 2007 - 18:07:29 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Wed May 02 2007 - 19:25:10 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 02 2007 - 21:30:48 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Wed May 02 2007 - 21:59:13 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:23:29 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Wed May 02 2007 - 20:25:51 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 02 2007 - 18:16:23 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Wed May 02 2007 - 20:27:10 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Wed May 02 2007 - 21:47:50 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Wed May 02 2007 - 22:37:25 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:39:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:27:44 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:12:08 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:36:00 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 12:13:13 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:44:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:19:10 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:28:47 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:52:05 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:55:47 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:59:51 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 16:11:48 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 16:47:21 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 13:09:45 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:24:54 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:41:14 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 02:05:55 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 02:09:54 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 09:13:49 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 02:49:18 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:39:29 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 16:30:10 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 16:25:19 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 21:52:07 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sat May 05 2007 - 02:53:18 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 09:36:35 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sat May 05 2007 - 17:28:06 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 18:39:35 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sat May 05 2007 - 17:50:25 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sat May 05 2007 - 20:57:02 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sun May 06 2007 - 08:51:54 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sun May 06 2007 - 18:49:54 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sun May 06 2007 - 19:11:15 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sun May 06 2007 - 19:21:11 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Sun May 06 2007 - 21:30:19 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sun May 06 2007 - 19:12:23 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 16:37:18 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Fri May 04 2007 - 21:16:59 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Sat May 05 2007 - 16:21:01 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sat May 05 2007 - 17:46:43 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Sat May 05 2007 - 17:00:25 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Mon May 07 2007 - 04:52:46 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 07 2007 - 07:56:32 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Mon May 07 2007 - 09:34:16 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 18:48:45 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Tue May 08 2007 - 14:59:52 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 07 2007 - 08:21:02 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 09:25:30 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 07 2007 - 13:15:57 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 20:27:54 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Mon May 07 2007 - 22:12:03 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Tue May 08 2007 - 03:53:31 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Tue May 08 2007 - 20:59:58 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Tue May 08 2007 - 23:26:16 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 09 2007 - 11:21:56 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Wed May 09 2007 - 19:52:01 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 10 2007 - 18:32:32 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 10 2007 - 18:42:32 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 10 2007 - 18:55:45 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 10 2007 - 19:10:51 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Fri May 11 2007 - 06:31:34 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri May 11 2007 - 17:56:44 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Fri May 11 2007 - 12:18:00 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Fri May 11 2007 - 18:09:26 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sat May 12 2007 - 10:31:03 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 12 2007 - 18:43:12 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Thu May 10 2007 - 22:53:02 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Fri May 11 2007 - 13:03:33 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Fri May 11 2007 - 16:30:27 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Sat May 12 2007 - 10:55:48 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sat May 12 2007 - 17:06:34 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Fri May 11 2007 - 05:10:30 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Fri May 11 2007 - 06:27:14 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 03:44:26 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:33:06 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
Marshall
(Thu May 03 2007 - 05:53:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 08:58:28 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:56:20 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 10:12:51 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:33:32 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Kevin Kirkpatrick
(Thu May 03 2007 - 13:41:25 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 13:53:07 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Kevin Kirkpatrick
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:45:36 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:00:09 CEST)
Re: Is it possible to use a database though any high-level API?
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 11:49:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 12:05:54 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 13:42:31 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:07:14 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 12:36:30 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Jon Heggland
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:53:35 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:10:44 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:22:28 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:58:47 CEST)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:22:40 CEST)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:55:00 CEST)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:56:27 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:30:45 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 14:43:03 CEST)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:39:14 CEST)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 16:09:45 CEST)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 16:31:52 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:50:19 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:51:58 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Thu May 03 2007 - 15:58:38 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
-CELKO-
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:40:59 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:17:45 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 00:05:06 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 01:23:23 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 01:32:29 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Fri May 04 2007 - 02:17:11 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 03:02:38 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Fri May 04 2007 - 05:17:04 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 04:02:10 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:04:38 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 16:52:07 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:16:54 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:20:06 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
-CELKO-
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:23:43 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:02:44 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:21:59 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:24:28 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:26:57 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 17:46:37 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:42:29 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:45:22 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:09:43 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:30:31 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:10:10 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:13:39 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:31:07 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:40:17 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:45:42 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 18:56:10 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 19:01:52 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 19:26:06 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 19:44:38 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:04:00 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:36:52 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:04:34 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:38:12 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Gene Wirchenko
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:13:02 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Thu May 03 2007 - 21:24:56 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
TroyK
(Thu May 03 2007 - 22:45:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 08:44:43 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 01:58:42 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 02:04:09 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 02:10:41 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 04 2007 - 02:35:44 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 08:34:54 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 04:14:20 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 04 2007 - 04:51:02 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 08:36:40 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Alvin Ryder
(Fri May 04 2007 - 05:40:20 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Fri May 04 2007 - 08:40:45 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Alvin Ryder
(Tue May 08 2007 - 03:47:50 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Alvin Ryder
(Fri May 04 2007 - 06:05:09 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Gene Wirchenko
(Fri May 04 2007 - 06:56:36 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 13:59:19 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Fri May 04 2007 - 14:30:15 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Fri May 04 2007 - 18:38:31 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 04 2007 - 14:27:54 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 14:57:10 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 15:16:04 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 17:36:50 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 17:59:58 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 18:50:56 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 20:13:01 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
paul c
(Sat May 05 2007 - 17:10:07 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Sat May 05 2007 - 18:34:25 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 20:20:23 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Fri May 04 2007 - 20:25:56 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Fri May 04 2007 - 20:49:39 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 05 2007 - 11:42:28 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 14:27:53 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Bob Badour
(Sat May 05 2007 - 15:06:51 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 16:53:56 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 15:17:52 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 16:56:02 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 19:02:32 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 19:04:32 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sat May 05 2007 - 20:51:48 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David BL
(Sun May 06 2007 - 14:53:58 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 19:30:04 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 20:21:35 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Sat May 05 2007 - 21:03:33 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 05 2007 - 21:31:40 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Sat May 05 2007 - 21:54:48 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 21:40:01 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Sat May 05 2007 - 22:07:36 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Sat May 05 2007 - 22:17:35 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Sat May 05 2007 - 23:23:11 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 06 2007 - 08:30:01 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 06 2007 - 08:32:42 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Bob Badour
(Sun May 06 2007 - 14:40:46 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
David Cressey
(Sun May 06 2007 - 11:57:11 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 07 2007 - 08:03:30 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
(Sun May 06 2007 - 23:59:14 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 07 2007 - 05:27:48 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon May 07 2007 - 05:37:25 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 07 2007 - 15:36:23 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
paul c
(Tue May 08 2007 - 05:09:37 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Christopher Browne
(Mon May 07 2007 - 14:34:42 CEST)
Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Cimode
(Tue May 08 2007 - 09:35:33 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Christopher Browne
(Mon May 07 2007 - 14:51:22 CEST)
Re: Newbie question on table design.
Bob Badour
(Tue May 08 2007 - 14:13:50 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 08 2007 - 10:58:24 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Wed May 09 2007 - 15:00:10 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 09 2007 - 18:15:01 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 09 2007 - 18:58:07 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 09 2007 - 22:56:02 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 10 2007 - 08:20:42 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Thu May 10 2007 - 22:46:58 CEST)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
Cimode
(Thu May 10 2007 - 10:02:29 CEST)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
David Cressey
(Thu May 10 2007 - 10:11:40 CEST)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
-CELKO-
(Thu May 10 2007 - 19:53:33 CEST)
Re: how different indexing techniques work as dimensionality increases?
kerad
(Fri May 11 2007 - 00:03:29 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 11 2007 - 01:30:44 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Marshall
(Fri May 11 2007 - 03:25:55 CEST)
Re: more closed-world chatter
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 11 2007 - 06:37:45 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Fri May 11 2007 - 23:07:58 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 12 2007 - 00:50:19 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 12 2007 - 00:59:54 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 12 2007 - 02:58:50 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 12 2007 - 14:14:35 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Bob Badour
(Sat May 12 2007 - 14:22:30 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 12 2007 - 15:20:54 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Sat May 12 2007 - 17:00:47 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 13 2007 - 00:30:00 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 13 2007 - 03:40:01 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 13 2007 - 08:21:29 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 13 2007 - 11:50:28 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 13 2007 - 23:47:48 CEST)
Re: set builder notation for relational division
Vadim Tropashko
(Mon May 14 2007 - 19:28:42 CEST)
Re: set builder notation for relational division
Vadim Tropashko
(Mon May 14 2007 - 19:39:33 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Mon May 14 2007 - 22:31:39 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 14 2007 - 23:38:11 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
Bob Badour
(Wed May 16 2007 - 00:38:17 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
Vadim Tropashko
(Wed May 16 2007 - 01:45:39 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
Bob Badour
(Wed May 16 2007 - 03:21:30 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
Vadim Tropashko
(Wed May 16 2007 - 03:29:45 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed May 16 2007 - 01:48:15 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
David Cressey
(Wed May 16 2007 - 02:57:57 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 16 2007 - 08:38:34 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
David Cressey
(Wed May 16 2007 - 12:34:30 CEST)
Re: bags vs. sets
Bob Badour
(Wed May 16 2007 - 13:05:18 CEST)
Re: Isolation levels
V.J. Kumar
(Wed May 16 2007 - 14:41:19 CEST)
Re: Isolation levels
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 16 2007 - 14:57:49 CEST)
Re: Isolation levels
Razvan Socol
(Sat May 19 2007 - 19:13:17 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
David Cressey
(Thu May 17 2007 - 15:49:51 CEST)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Bob Hairgrove
(Thu May 17 2007 - 17:55:13 CEST)
Re: Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
Frank Hamersley
(Thu May 17 2007 - 23:44:31 CEST)
Re: Isolation levels
Lee Fesperman
(Thu May 17 2007 - 20:10:23 CEST)
Re: Self Joins and optimization
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 18 2007 - 00:23:15 CEST)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
artev
(Fri May 18 2007 - 14:41:10 CEST)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
Ed Prochak
(Tue May 22 2007 - 20:09:15 CEST)
Re: two db: is possible to limit the access of the users?
Bob Badour
(Tue May 22 2007 - 22:04:45 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
paul c
(Sat May 19 2007 - 03:35:40 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Marshall
(Sat May 19 2007 - 04:13:38 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Marshall
(Sat May 19 2007 - 04:19:20 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
David Portas
(Sat May 19 2007 - 09:16:47 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 19 2007 - 20:02:53 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Bob Badour
(Sat May 19 2007 - 21:23:19 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 19 2007 - 23:20:16 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Vadim Tropashko
(Sat May 19 2007 - 23:38:18 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Bob Badour
(Sun May 20 2007 - 00:55:32 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
David Cressey
(Sat May 19 2007 - 16:01:51 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
David Cressey
(Sat May 19 2007 - 16:08:04 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Sat May 19 2007 - 16:20:01 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Lennart
(Sat May 19 2007 - 16:31:50 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
David Portas
(Sun May 20 2007 - 00:04:56 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 19 2007 - 16:38:41 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Marshall
(Sat May 19 2007 - 20:05:32 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Bob Badour
(Sat May 19 2007 - 21:21:03 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Sat May 19 2007 - 16:52:15 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Lennart
(Sun May 20 2007 - 15:05:03 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 20 2007 - 00:37:08 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 20 2007 - 02:37:28 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 20 2007 - 02:57:39 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Gene Wirchenko
(Sun May 20 2007 - 04:12:31 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Sun May 20 2007 - 20:02:19 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Lennart
(Sun May 20 2007 - 20:19:07 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Mon May 21 2007 - 01:24:07 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
V.J. Kumar
(Mon May 21 2007 - 02:55:20 CEST)
Re: GROUP BY
Lennart
(Mon May 21 2007 - 09:17:08 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Mon May 21 2007 - 06:08:41 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Mon May 21 2007 - 06:14:42 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Vadim Tropashko
(Mon May 21 2007 - 20:35:34 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Sat May 26 2007 - 16:27:59 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Sun May 27 2007 - 05:10:48 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 21 2007 - 06:47:36 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Mon May 21 2007 - 07:10:01 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
David Portas
(Mon May 21 2007 - 08:04:53 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 22 2007 - 00:26:38 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Tue May 22 2007 - 01:58:11 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 22 2007 - 04:32:18 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 03:01:07 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Marshall
(Wed May 23 2007 - 05:59:20 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Gene Wirchenko
(Wed May 23 2007 - 06:08:49 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 07:52:34 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 16:27:38 CEST)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Goran Mandinic
(Wed May 23 2007 - 09:06:17 CEST)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 23 2007 - 09:28:10 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
hasta_l3_at_hotmail.com
(Wed May 23 2007 - 09:16:36 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 10:40:13 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 10:40:43 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Bob Badour
(Wed May 23 2007 - 17:20:49 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
hasta_l3_at_hotmail.com
(Wed May 23 2007 - 18:44:59 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Wed May 23 2007 - 09:24:36 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 10:41:56 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 17:35:27 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
David Cressey
(Wed May 23 2007 - 11:48:20 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Bob Badour
(Wed May 23 2007 - 17:27:39 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
DBMS_Plumber
(Wed May 23 2007 - 20:27:55 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
DBMS_Plumber
(Wed May 23 2007 - 20:28:13 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
-CELKO-
(Fri May 25 2007 - 04:10:23 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Wed May 23 2007 - 12:51:53 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 13:00:25 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
paul c
(Wed May 23 2007 - 17:06:36 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 18:45:48 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Wed May 23 2007 - 13:37:43 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Bob Badour
(Wed May 23 2007 - 16:21:28 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 15:38:49 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
David Cressey
(Wed May 23 2007 - 16:46:13 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Wed May 23 2007 - 16:57:04 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Cimode
(Wed May 23 2007 - 17:20:46 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 23 2007 - 18:26:55 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Thu May 24 2007 - 02:33:23 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Bob Badour
(Thu May 24 2007 - 05:17:50 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
paul c
(Thu May 24 2007 - 05:33:58 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
daveb
(Wed May 23 2007 - 19:23:44 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
hasta_l3_at_hotmail.com
(Wed May 23 2007 - 20:56:07 CEST)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Eric
(Wed May 23 2007 - 20:56:03 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 24 2007 - 05:33:58 CEST)
Re: constraints in algebra instead of calculus
Brian Selzer
(Thu May 24 2007 - 07:56:30 CEST)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
David Cressey
(Fri May 25 2007 - 01:31:31 CEST)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
paul c
(Fri May 25 2007 - 03:04:20 CEST)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
paul c
(Fri May 25 2007 - 03:07:45 CEST)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Brian Selzer
(Fri May 25 2007 - 04:34:48 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
David Cressey
(Fri May 25 2007 - 06:30:29 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Roy Hann
(Fri May 25 2007 - 09:38:53 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
David Cressey
(Fri May 25 2007 - 14:51:00 CEST)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
dawn
(Fri May 25 2007 - 15:23:22 CEST)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
-CELKO-
(Fri May 25 2007 - 16:04:48 CEST)
Re: Question about "linking tables"
Neo
(Fri May 25 2007 - 16:35:18 CEST)
Re: Stupid Database Tricks
Gene Wirchenko
(Fri May 25 2007 - 18:13:15 CEST)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 26 2007 - 17:14:14 CEST)
Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sat May 26 2007 - 17:26:28 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sat May 26 2007 - 18:18:58 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sat May 26 2007 - 19:29:13 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 00:11:54 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sun May 27 2007 - 05:16:28 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 09:58:27 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 16:08:13 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 16:48:21 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sun May 27 2007 - 17:57:07 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 22:41:43 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Mon May 28 2007 - 03:38:22 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 10:20:06 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 10:28:50 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 21:52:37 CEST)
Re: Guidelines to a decent support of surrogate key implementation
Brian Selzer
(Sat May 26 2007 - 21:22:56 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 00:06:55 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 10:27:37 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 00:58:03 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 01:16:34 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 17:42:16 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon May 28 2007 - 00:40:09 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Mon May 28 2007 - 01:13:17 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Alfredo Novoa
(Mon May 28 2007 - 09:03:36 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listening to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bert Blink
(Mon May 28 2007 - 11:44:40 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listening to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Mon May 28 2007 - 22:13:59 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bruce C. Baker
(Sun May 27 2007 - 02:42:59 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 03:23:02 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
DBMS_Plumber
(Wed May 30 2007 - 19:21:48 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 10:29:40 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bruce C. Baker
(Sun May 27 2007 - 05:01:32 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sun May 27 2007 - 05:27:00 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 16:04:31 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bruce C. Baker
(Sun May 27 2007 - 05:54:07 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
paul c
(Sun May 27 2007 - 06:44:25 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 16:07:09 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Sun May 27 2007 - 16:06:01 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bruce C. Baker
(Sun May 27 2007 - 07:34:28 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Sun May 27 2007 - 19:48:20 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 13:43:56 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Sun May 27 2007 - 14:19:30 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 14:23:15 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 16:34:42 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
David Cressey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 14:58:24 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Sun May 27 2007 - 16:41:41 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Marshall
(Sun May 27 2007 - 17:53:57 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Jon Heggland
(Mon May 28 2007 - 11:44:34 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Roy Hann
(Sun May 27 2007 - 15:28:26 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Sun May 27 2007 - 15:58:45 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Sun May 27 2007 - 22:33:46 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
-CELKO-
(Mon May 28 2007 - 01:55:34 CEST)
Re: Looking for Employee data model
-CELKO-
(Mon May 28 2007 - 00:30:02 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 00:31:16 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 01:14:49 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 28 2007 - 02:39:25 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon May 28 2007 - 04:13:12 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Mon May 28 2007 - 11:20:12 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Keith H Duggar
(Mon May 28 2007 - 20:25:55 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Alfredo Novoa
(Tue May 29 2007 - 13:18:09 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Mon May 28 2007 - 11:32:05 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 11:33:54 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 11:32:35 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 14:54:47 CEST)
Quod est veritas
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 15:57:33 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 16:12:36 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 16:23:19 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Mon May 28 2007 - 22:22:53 CEST)
Re: Looking for Employee data model
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 17:03:05 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
David Cressey
(Mon May 28 2007 - 17:07:25 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Gene Wirchenko
(Mon May 28 2007 - 18:22:33 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Mon May 28 2007 - 20:38:42 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Mon May 28 2007 - 21:01:57 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 28 2007 - 21:16:37 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Cimode
(Tue May 29 2007 - 10:54:59 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Eric
(Mon May 28 2007 - 21:32:28 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Mon May 28 2007 - 22:31:08 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (3): Qualifying as relation *any* predicate
DM Unseen
(Tue May 29 2007 - 10:20:15 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (3): Qualifying as relation *any* predicate
Cimode
(Tue May 29 2007 - 10:51:14 CEST)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Goran Mandinic
(Tue May 29 2007 - 13:01:24 CEST)
Re: Databasescheme with UML
Jon Heggland
(Tue May 29 2007 - 14:25:32 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Tue May 29 2007 - 13:48:42 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Matthias Klaey
(Tue May 29 2007 - 17:09:48 CEST)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Marshall
(Tue May 29 2007 - 23:47:59 CEST)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Jon Heggland
(Wed May 30 2007 - 08:27:19 CEST)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Wed May 30 2007 - 18:18:33 CEST)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Marshall
(Thu May 31 2007 - 05:52:59 CEST)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 31 2007 - 18:28:48 CEST)
Re: Relational symmetric difference is well defined
Vadim Tropashko
(Thu May 31 2007 - 20:25:45 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
daveb
(Wed May 30 2007 - 01:16:13 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Bob Badour
(Wed May 30 2007 - 01:27:34 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
daveb
(Wed May 30 2007 - 03:03:42 CEST)
Re: Book recall
daveb
(Wed May 30 2007 - 03:18:44 CEST)
Re: Book recall
Bob Badour
(Wed May 30 2007 - 03:37:15 CEST)
Re: Book recall
-CELKO-
(Wed May 30 2007 - 15:33:50 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Brian Selzer
(Wed May 30 2007 - 08:50:44 CEST)
Re: Book recall
David Cressey
(Wed May 30 2007 - 15:59:48 CEST)
Re: Book recall
-CELKO-
(Wed May 30 2007 - 19:38:49 CEST)
Re: Book recall
Bob Badour
(Wed May 30 2007 - 23:46:45 CEST)
Re: From class diagram to physical data model : conceptual data model or not ?
Cimode
(Thu May 31 2007 - 21:54:48 CEST)
Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)
Larry Coon
(Thu May 31 2007 - 22:22:26 CEST)
Newbie question about design
idaku2_at_gmail.com
(Tue May 01 2007 - 11:29:11 CEST)
Re: Newbie question about design
Bob Badour
(Tue May 01 2007 - 15:04:25 CEST)
Newsgroup Signal to Noise Ratio
David Cressey
(Tue May 01 2007 - 14:49:40 CEST)
Last message date
:
Tue May 01 2007 - 04:51:23 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 22:01:02 CEST
21 messages
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Other periods
:[
Next, Thread view
] [
List of Folders
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.