Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 07:27:44 GMT
Message-ID: <Q9g_h.156316$6m4.3670_at_pd7urf1no>
>
> I was not thinking about *subtleness*. ...
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 07:27:44 GMT
Message-ID: <Q9g_h.156316$6m4.3670_at_pd7urf1no>
Cimode wrote:
> On 2 mai, 21:47, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:
>
>>Cimode wrote: >> >>... >> >> >>>Brian, >> >>>Don't you think you are overcomplicating things? >> >>I certainly do. RT isn't as complicated or subtle as this thread is >>making it out to be.
>
> I was not thinking about *subtleness*. ...
It's talk of mutations that's too subtle for me.
I am having trouble following
> Brian's wordy line of thought. I am not sure he and I have do not
> have the same perception of what logical and physical independence
> is. I was also refering to terms I am not familiar with such as
> *database state*. To me they are totally foreign to RM formal
> theory.
>
> Maybe you could clarify. Thanks.
> Regards...
>
(In another recent post, I think Bob B defended Codd's mention of "instantaneous state" after I complained about it, can't remember which post.)
p Received on Thu May 03 2007 - 09:27:44 CEST