Re: Newbie question on table design.

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_acm.org>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 08:51:22 -0400
Message-ID: <87d51cg5kl.fsf_at_wolfe.cbbrowne.com>


Quoth Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>:
>> Canucks still obsessed with Nixon, no idea why, whereas still don't
>> understand people worship Trudeau's memory, he accelerated the
>> admittedly inevitable running of the country into the ground. That
>> was when a buck was a buck, men were men and so were the women.
>> Sorry, off-topic again!
>
> Trudeau did a heck of a lot more harm than good. In fact, I am not
> sure he did any good at all. I find his son entering politics kinda
> bewildering.

The thing is, Trudeau was an *interesting* character.

In retrospect, he ignored economics when setting many other sorts of policy, which was very stupid.

But when he opened his mouth and said things, they tended to be interesting things. The same has not been generally true of his successors.

Clinton certainly had some problems; dallying with interns was hugely unprofessional. But if he were in town doing a talk, I'd be somewhat keen on hearing it, because he's an exceedingly accomplished speaker. There isn't another living ex-US president that's comparable, and few others. (And even those that wanted Dubya in have *got* to admit his ability to speak is impoverished in comparison...)

Trudeau clearly had a lot of ideas, and interesting ones. That they didn't all turn out as hoped for does not make them uninteresting.

-- 
output = ("cbbrowne" "_at_" "gmail.com")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/wp.html
C++: The power, elegance and simplicity of a hand grenade.
Received on Mon May 07 2007 - 14:51:22 CEST

Original text of this message