Re: more closed-world chatter

From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 10 May 2007 21:31:34 -0700
Message-ID: <1178857894.025368.321280_at_y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>


On May 10, 10:10 am, Vadim Tropashko <vadimtro_inva..._at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 9:55 am, Vadim Tropashko <vadimtro_inva..._at_yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The generalized Date
> > > identity is:
>
> > > (A /\ B) \/ (A /\ 00) = A \ (A \ B)
>
> > > where /\ is join, \/ is generalized union, and \ is antijoin.
>
> > The reason why this formula is fascinating is that setting B=11
> > reduces it to
>
> > (A /\ 11) \/ (A /\ 00) = A
>
> > the "fundamental" decomposition identity (Proposition 1 fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0603044).
>
> Writing in small increments... And setting B=00 gives
>
> A /\ 00 = A / A
>
> which is more obvious (and, therefore, less interesting:-) identity.

Is that supposed to be

  A /\ 00 = A \ A

I would expect that

  A /\ 00 = <something with A's attributes and no members>   A / A = 01

But I could be confused.

Marshall Received on Fri May 11 2007 - 06:31:34 CEST

Original text of this message