Re: A new proof of the superiority of set oriented approaches: numerical/time serie linear interpolation
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 10:26:06 -0700
Message-ID: <cm6k33peop57vsncqrao47r8ndvk4m9c8t_at_4ax.com>
Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
>> Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>>Interpolation has a number of other traps. Suppose one evaluates:
>>>f(x) = (x-1)/(x-1) at x=0 and x=2. One will reach a vastly wrong
>>>conclusion if one even tries to interpolate f(1).
>>
>> What about if we limit it to functions? Your f is not a
>> function, because 1 is not in the domain. (I am assuming a general
>> (for lack of a better word) domain, such as N, Z, Q, or R.)
>
>If 1 were not in the domain, one would have no desire to interpolate to
>it in the first place. That sounds like ignoring the problem by defining
>it out of existence.
If 1 is in the domain, then f(x) does not have a defined value for 1, and is, thus, not a function.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Thu May 03 2007 - 19:26:06 CEST