Re: Stupid Database Tricks
From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:37:43 +0100
Message-ID: <gradnembFKkVusnbnZ2dnUVZ8sGvnZ2d_at_pipex.net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:37:43 +0100
Message-ID: <gradnembFKkVusnbnZ2dnUVZ8sGvnZ2d_at_pipex.net>
"Brian Selzer" <brian_at_selzer-software.com> wrote in message
news:d9V4i.6084$4Y.5622_at_newssvr19.news.prodigy.net...
> Now, now, Marshall. System-generated surrogates can simplifiy things if
>
> (1) the database is temporal--particularly historical,
> (2) some constraints are temporal,
You are describing a possible workaround, not a desirable feature. One should make that clear. Also it is not clear this is even a good workaround. I suspect it is a very inadequate one.
Wrong. Seriously wrong. See my earlier response to David Cressey re ON
UPDATE CASCADE.
> and either (1) or (2),
> (4) the schema may evolve and (1), or