Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (2): Listenning to CELKO (and CELKO alikes)

On 27 mai, 05:16, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:

> Matthias Klaey wrote:
> > Cimode <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > ...
>
> > Hmm. Is this just the usual Celko-bashing in this newsgroup? Did you
> > intend to write a parody on how to misread and misinterpert other
> > peoples texts? You don't mean this seriously, do you?
>
> Usually I think much of what he writes here deserves to be bashed as it
> is not about theory, just various flawed products, workarounds and
> various design gospel he likes to preach.   I think it's okay to talk
> about that stuff in a product group but this is a theory group.

What do you think about the design mistakes identified based on this thread(that was the real purpose of the thread and the reason for commenting CELKO's *taxonomy*)...I am talking about...

--> 1 Defining keys according to human perception
--> 2 Considering there are several realities (external/internal -
based on human perception)
--> 3 Believing in magic
--> 4 Believing that a key is physical concept
--> 5 Defining keys in function of lazy people.
--> 6 Making sense out of CELKO writing and *taxonomies*
Received on Sun May 27 2007 - 16:48:21 CEST