Re: more closed-world chatter
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 13:39:29 GMT
Message-ID: <lCl_h.156056$DE1.84607_at_pd7urf2no>
Bob Badour wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>
>> paul c wrote:
>>
>>> If I have a domain of items consisting of the values "a" and "b" and
>>> a domain of item prices consisting of the values "1" and "2" and an
>>> empty relation {ItemID, Price} known by the relvar name "Items", I
>>> take it that the logical complement of "Items" has four tuples -
>>> loosely, <a,1>,<a,2>,<b,1>,<b,2>.
>>>
>>> If I select from Items where Price = 3, should a dbms answer with an
>>> empty relation or should it take exception, such as "illegal
>>> question"? If it doesn't take exception, then I'd guess it is
>>> supposing a complement that has an infinite number of tuples which
>>> couldn't be implemented on a finite computer.
>>>
>>> As unhappy as this makes me, I'm now thinking exceptions can't be
>>> avoided in practice.
>>>
>>> p
>>
>>
>> Ie., is it a logical mistake to allow the query in the first place?
> > > No, it is not a logical mistake. Equality evaluates to false for values > of disjoint types. Because 3 is not in your type, the comparison > evaluates to false. > ...
p Received on Thu May 03 2007 - 15:39:29 CEST