Re: Little design mistakes that can be easily avoided (3): Qualifying as relation *any* predicate
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 29 May 2007 01:51:14 -0700
Message-ID: <1180428674.731029.134990_at_q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Date: 29 May 2007 01:51:14 -0700
Message-ID: <1180428674.731029.134990_at_q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
On May 29, 10:20 am, DM Unseen <dm.uns..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
[Snipped]
>
> I suspect you are reeinventing a NIAM like approach(or any of it's
> dervatives: FCO-IM,ORM(2), FORML)
>
> DM Unseen
I am sorry that's what it looks like. I do not want to reinvent
anything. I am trying to put emphasis on the level of complexity
required of formulating relations before getting to the integrity and
identity part. I find that most debating energies are dedicated to
these two last part and not enough to relation formulation.
Regards... Received on Tue May 29 2007 - 10:51:14 CEST