Re: Newbie question on table design.

From: David Cressey <cressey73_at_verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 18:20:23 GMT
Message-ID: <HPK_h.26$83.19_at_trndny08>


"paul c" <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac> wrote in message news:bkJ_h.158322$DE1.89425_at_pd7urf2no...
> David Cressey wrote:
> > ...
> > Fair enough. IBM culture was big enough, at the time, so it could
> > accommodate a large number of internal subcultures. The part of IBM
culture
> > that was visible to me was definitely not into interactive development.
> >
> > Even though they had interactive terminals, on line editing, etc. etc.
> > compiling a source program was a batch job. And that affected the
workflow.
> > ...
>
> Nit: I think this should have said "typical" IBM culture.

If you like. I think of the word "culture" as always carrying the qualifier "typical" attached to it. For any place where I have used the term culture, feel free to substitute "typical culture" Received on Fri May 04 2007 - 20:20:23 CEST

Original text of this message