comp.databases.theory: by thread

Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 00:12:34 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 00:38:00 CET)

Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 01:13:36 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships David BL (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 03:01:02 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 03:46:04 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships David BL (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 03:49:10 CET)
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information David BL (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 04:17:07 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships David BL (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:11:33 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10 (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:26:56 CET)
MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Spying on my Home (537) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 11:48:52 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships V.J. Kumar (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 05:37:55 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 10:36:56 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 11:46:17 CET)
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:15:07 CET)
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 12:05:51 CET)
      - Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:10:07 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 12:43:03 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 13:37:29 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 13:40:14 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 14:16:46 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 14:21:20 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 15:00:29 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 15:34:47 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:03:21 CET)
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:47:38 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:04:35 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:11:40 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:32:37 CET)
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:50:06 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 18:08:25 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10 (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 18:53:43 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 19:26:52 CET)
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 20:00:27 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 19:33:30 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 19:40:03 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 19:46:05 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 19:46:38 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 20:13:12 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 20:28:51 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 21:26:46 CET)
- Re: plz normalize this table for me David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 01:12:04 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 01:14:26 CET)
- Re: RM formalism supporting partial information David BL (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 02:51:15 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships V.J. Kumar (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 05:26:51 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 08:23:08 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 12:00:14 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 12:01:33 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 12:05:49 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 13:40:14 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 13:46:55 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 14:00:05 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 17:16:54 CET)
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 17:58:03 CET)
    - Re: RM formalism supporting partial information Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 18:32:33 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 18:46:43 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 19:05:50 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 19:33:40 CET)
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships Jon Heggland (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 20:07:31 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 19:41:21 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 21:28:58 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Tue Dec 04 2007 - 19:16:39 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Tue Dec 04 2007 - 19:37:06 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Tue Dec 04 2007 - 20:27:02 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10 (Tue Dec 04 2007 - 21:55:30 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 04 2007 - 22:03:47 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Tue Dec 04 2007 - 23:20:43 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10 (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 00:03:13 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Ruud de Koter (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 00:42:37 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 02:10:11 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 04:46:47 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Ruud de Koter (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 07:09:03 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 11:49:50 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER Ruud de Koter (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 23:05:22 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? Jon Heggland (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 13:02:34 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 13:24:31 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER Ruud de Koter (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 22:59:32 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 13:38:28 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 13:52:31 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 13:54:42 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 16:27:03 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 14:02:04 CET)
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10 (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 15:45:24 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 16:25:29 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 16:50:26 CET)
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 17:46:26 CET)
      - Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 09:35:10 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 14:57:37 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 15:16:56 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 15:20:33 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 15:31:15 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 15:48:02 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 17:41:13 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jonathan Leffler (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 00:32:48 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 10:08:35 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 10:30:00 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 18:09:37 CET)
Re: What is analysis? TroyK (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 18:24:47 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 20:15:01 CET)
  - Re: What is analysis? David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 20:25:03 CET)
    - Re: What is analysis? David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 20:28:17 CET)
Re: What is analysis? David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 20:34:09 CET)
Re: What is analysis? TroyK (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 22:12:37 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Wed Dec 05 2007 - 22:38:10 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships Jan Hidders (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 01:09:25 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 01:18:07 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 02:47:33 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 05:33:59 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 09:37:32 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 10:56:52 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 11:29:53 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 11:58:57 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 12:22:31 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 13:19:48 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 14:12:14 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 16:20:56 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 16:39:28 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 16:41:00 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 17:15:14 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 18:07:14 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 09:36:56 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 18:30:18 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 18:40:46 CET)
Re: What is analysis? rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 18:44:37 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 18:50:51 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 09:42:27 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 19:13:58 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 19:15:03 CET)
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Jonathan Leffler (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 23:38:48 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 19:18:06 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 19:26:04 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 19:36:13 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 19:40:20 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 19:43:54 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 09:21:51 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 19:47:01 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 20:02:28 CET)
Re: What is analysis? rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 20:26:46 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 20:49:33 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 20:53:09 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 12:17:34 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 13:55:41 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 21:12:11 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 21:36:59 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 22:27:02 CET)
Re: indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search Jonathan Leffler (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 00:20:53 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 01:24:39 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 01:41:53 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 03:06:29 CET)
- Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 03:09:16 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 07:34:03 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10 (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 11:22:58 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships vldm10 (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 11:37:48 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 13:11:27 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 14:15:28 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 14:27:14 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 17:26:51 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 21:31:42 CET)
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 22:07:02 CET)
      - Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 03:13:36 CET)
      - Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 03:16:43 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 03:38:54 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:11:41 CET)
        
        Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:13:43 CET)
OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:44:43 CET)
- Re: OT editors mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 05:22:28 CET)
Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) David Cressey (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 12:19:55 CET)
Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) Roy Hann (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 16:34:23 CET)
- Re: OT editors Frank Hamersley (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 13:06:28 CET)
Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) David Cressey (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 17:11:58 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:04:57 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:18:02 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:34:29 CET)
    - Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:58:56 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:32:15 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:53:48 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 05:23:24 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 16:37:30 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jon Heggland (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 15:18:28 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 17:04:00 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 17:12:51 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 18:29:49 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 19:17:50 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 20:08:55 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 21:45:24 CET)
  - Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 22:11:37 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 20:12:48 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER TroyK (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 20:21:33 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Tegiri Nenashi (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 20:25:25 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER TroyK (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 20:49:53 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 21:36:05 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 22:37:57 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 12:26:04 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER David BL (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 12:28:03 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 16:00:21 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER dawn (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 19:27:57 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 20:57:46 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 21:09:20 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Sat Dec 08 2007 - 21:37:41 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 02:32:51 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 04:04:05 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 05:05:25 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 05:38:53 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 09:38:04 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 13:47:17 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 14:52:48 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 15:13:35 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 17:15:32 CET)
Re: OT editors Roy Hann (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 17:27:26 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 18:20:27 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Sun Dec 09 2007 - 22:10:32 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar (Mon Dec 10 2007 - 02:09:08 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 10 2007 - 17:19:53 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 10 2007 - 18:49:17 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Mon Dec 10 2007 - 19:33:09 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Mon Dec 10 2007 - 19:59:40 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER mAsterdam (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 01:10:34 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 02:13:20 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Gene Wirchenko (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 04:24:04 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 12:37:29 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 15:08:34 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Marshall (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 15:57:43 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies David Cressey (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 17:50:48 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 18:20:39 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 20:29:41 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 21:37:31 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 21:47:52 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 22:06:57 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 22:27:48 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 22:47:32 CET)
Re: Anyone remember this book? -CELKO- (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 02:05:58 CET)
Re: Anyone remember this book? Evan Keel (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 16:14:55 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 18:37:21 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 20:32:39 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 20:36:42 CET)
Re: OT editors (was: Another view on analysis and ER) rpost (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 20:43:19 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 21:35:00 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 21:57:13 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 22:30:47 CET)
Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases Jan Hidders (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 00:28:49 CET)
Re: Anyone remember this book? Brian Selzer (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 01:18:51 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 01:26:22 CET)
Re: Character string relation and functional dependencies V.J. Kumar (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 02:17:56 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 13:14:12 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 18:30:42 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO- (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 15:12:11 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 09:01:28 CET)
Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases silentser_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 18:41:54 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? mAsterdam (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 20:10:53 CET)
Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases Jan Hidders (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 21:47:05 CET)
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) d-42 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 00:14:06 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 09:26:21 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:02:55 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 20:30:38 CET)
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:40:38 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? mAsterdam (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:29:34 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Roy Hann (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 09:35:35 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 13:16:59 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 13:00:39 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 13:11:50 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 14:07:20 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 20:13:08 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:28:41 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Jon Heggland (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 12:17:52 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 15:59:40 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 16:49:34 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 16:10:07 CET)
Re: Query independency from updates problem for relational databases silentser_at_gmail.com (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 16:23:50 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 17:13:30 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:07:05 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO- (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 17:50:14 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Knowledgy (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:10:48 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 20:34:30 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO- (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:13:14 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:59:44 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 19:18:35 CET)
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 19:28:42 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 20:49:21 CET)
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Gene Wirchenko (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:44:43 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:36:43 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:51:39 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 20:43:05 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:21:25 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Ross Presser (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:52:36 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 19:12:34 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Ross Presser (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 19:01:32 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 19:14:41 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 19:39:19 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 19:55:36 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 20:31:54 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 20:49:03 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 21:25:25 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO- (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 21:30:04 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:40:10 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Gene Wirchenko (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:37:04 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:43:35 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:51:21 CET)
Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) -CELKO- (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 00:51:39 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO- (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 01:06:44 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO- (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 01:09:11 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? -CELKO- (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 01:12:07 CET)
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 02:11:59 CET)
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 02:16:09 CET)
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? Evan Keel (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 02:29:11 CET)
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? mAsterdam (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 10:16:12 CET)
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Jan Hidders (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 03:50:13 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 06:17:09 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 10:08:46 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 14:49:27 CET)
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 11:16:51 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Jan Hidders (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 11:57:40 CET)
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Jan Hidders (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 12:14:45 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 12:21:32 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 14:54:11 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 12:22:40 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 12:50:47 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 13:56:40 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 15:07:09 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 14:13:52 CET)
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? David Cressey (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 14:30:22 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 14:39:08 CET)
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? David Cressey (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 14:40:24 CET)
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 15:59:08 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 14:48:37 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 15:51:10 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 15:07:15 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 15:43:04 CET)
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? raylopez99 (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 16:17:13 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 16:30:52 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? rpl (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 10:40:58 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 16:41:24 CET)
Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? raylopez99 (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 16:48:01 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Roy Hann (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 11:54:03 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 23:56:54 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 00:23:51 CET)
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 11:15:13 CET)
      - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 14:41:49 CET)
        
        Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 20:01:28 CET)
        
        Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 20:50:14 CET)
        
        Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 22:57:54 CET)
        
        Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 00:13:07 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 18:25:57 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 22:27:12 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 20:37:41 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 20:38:28 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Hugo Kornelis (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 23:36:43 CET)
Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 01:42:32 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 03:57:36 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 09:44:03 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 09:48:25 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? David Cressey (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 12:05:52 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99 (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 12:13:12 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 12:45:03 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? David Cressey (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 13:24:19 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 14:05:05 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 14:40:33 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 14:39:18 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 15:14:27 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 23:06:15 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 18:33:12 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Roy Hann (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 19:14:19 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? David Cressey (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 19:31:55 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 20:02:41 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Dr. Dweeb (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 21:54:20 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Dr. Dweeb (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 22:08:02 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Tony Rogerson (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 23:00:09 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 00:13:46 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Jonathan Leffler (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 05:49:48 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 23:38:50 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Hugo Kornelis (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 23:52:39 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Hugo Kornelis (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 23:55:07 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Hugo Kornelis (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 00:00:40 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 00:39:34 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Gene Wirchenko (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 03:45:07 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 04:55:40 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 10:43:35 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 14:44:37 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 16:31:46 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 14:51:06 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 16:45:28 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 15:31:03 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 15:34:08 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99 (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 15:58:10 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 17:02:04 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? rpl (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 12:13:38 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? David Cressey (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 16:51:53 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 16:55:58 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 16:57:39 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 18:14:54 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99 (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 20:52:29 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? mAsterdam (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 21:09:49 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 21:42:50 CET)
Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99 (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 21:13:17 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? mAsterdam (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 21:59:47 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Mon Dec 17 2007 - 22:39:49 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 01:53:06 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 05:38:04 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 12:27:57 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER David Cressey (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 12:55:05 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 13:06:31 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER Brian Selzer (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 16:02:59 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Kevin Kirkpatrick (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 21:35:15 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 23:03:53 CET)
Re: Wanna be a DBA? Jerry Gitomer (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 03:22:59 CET)
- Re: Wanna be a DBA? Tony Rogerson (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 13:45:20 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 06:34:57 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 11:55:43 CET)
- Re: Another view on analysis and ER Bob Badour (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 16:18:44 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 12:34:13 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 16:25:18 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 12:41:51 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 12:59:10 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Frank Hamersley (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 12:07:22 CET)
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Sampo Syreeni (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 15:38:56 CET)
Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 16:55:31 CET)
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Lon Stowell (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 02:56:17 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 20:12:16 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 20:32:16 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 21:03:56 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Anith Sen (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 22:04:31 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 22:08:21 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER rpost (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 22:10:38 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? JOG (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 00:53:05 CET)
- what are keys and surrogates? rpost (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 22:06:00 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 08:10:22 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 16:03:41 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 20:40:28 CET)
Re: Implementing Dataphor Providers in Visual Studio - Help! Ed Prochak (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 21:03:30 CET)
Re: Implementing Dataphor Providers in Visual Studio - Help! stevedtrm (Fri Dec 21 2007 - 00:35:59 CET)
Re: Implementing Dataphor Providers in Visual Studio - Help! jingleheimerschmitt_at_hotmail.com (Fri Dec 21 2007 - 00:47:54 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Fri Dec 21 2007 - 15:58:55 CET)
Re: what are keys and surrogates? JOG (Fri Dec 21 2007 - 18:52:59 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 14:17:06 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Frank Hamersley (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 04:05:18 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 00:06:15 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 01:50:32 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 04:25:46 CET)
  - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 16:43:18 CET)
    - Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 05:31:29 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? David Cressey (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 12:31:32 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? raylopez99 (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 12:43:46 CET)
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? raylopez99 (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 12:47:40 CET)
  - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? David Cressey (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 14:00:59 CET)
    - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 19:13:53 CET)
    - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 19:25:38 CET)
    - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Gene Wirchenko (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 22:27:21 CET)
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? raylopez99 (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 23:26:01 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? mAsterdam (Sun Dec 23 2007 - 14:34:32 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP] (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 01:53:07 CET)
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 02:26:19 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP] (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 01:54:28 CET)
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 02:24:47 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP] (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 01:55:17 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 02:02:59 CET)
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP] (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 03:12:03 CET)
  - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? rpl (Tue Dec 25 2007 - 09:13:21 CET)
    - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 25 2007 - 18:50:35 CET)
      - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? rpl (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 09:43:25 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 06:59:19 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Sampo Syreeni (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 16:30:53 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 14:05:56 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? paul c (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 20:19:56 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 20:07:53 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina (Mon Dec 24 2007 - 20:13:12 CET)
Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Knowledgy (Tue Dec 25 2007 - 18:10:56 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP] (Tue Dec 25 2007 - 21:18:58 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 01:27:46 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 01:28:51 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Sampo Syreeni (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 18:20:14 CET)
Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Tony Toews [MVP] (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 03:03:44 CET)
Re: schema help magawake (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 04:45:32 CET)
Re: schema help David BL (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 05:10:38 CET)
Re: schema help Cimode (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 09:39:54 CET)
Re: schema help Rob (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 17:08:49 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 18:54:47 CET)
Re: schema help Rob (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 21:07:32 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 02:57:41 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Sampo Syreeni (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 20:23:48 CET)
Re: NULLs stevedtrm (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 03:46:26 CET)
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 04:17:52 CET)
Re: schema help David BL (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 04:31:46 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 08:34:45 CET)
Re: NULLs stevedtrm (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 10:32:45 CET)
Re: NULLs Roy Hann (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 11:37:18 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 12:34:08 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 14:55:27 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 17:35:36 CET)
Re: schema help Rob (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 18:02:04 CET)
Re: NULLs Marshall (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 18:48:24 CET)
Re: NULLs Marshall (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 18:56:08 CET)
Re: NULLs JOG (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 20:40:51 CET)
- Re: NULLs paul c (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 20:51:25 CET)
Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 00:31:05 CET)
Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 00:31:14 CET)
Re: NULLs David BL (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 00:57:37 CET)
Re: NULLs JOG (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 01:41:51 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 01:58:56 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Portas (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 02:37:34 CET)
Re: NULLs David BL (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 03:49:04 CET)
Re: NULLs Marshall (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 03:51:59 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 07:18:09 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 14:41:12 CET)
- Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? paul c (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 23:23:23 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David Cressey (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 14:45:04 CET)
Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 23:43:23 CET)
Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 23:59:50 CET)
Re: NULLs Hugo Kornelis (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 00:00:14 CET)
- Re: NULLs mAsterdam (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 01:11:18 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 01:51:11 CET)
Re: NULLs David BL (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 02:59:13 CET)
Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance? Kira Yamato (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 07:04:57 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? Brian Selzer (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 07:41:40 CET)
A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99 (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 15:51:29 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Marshall (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 23:42:15 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? mAsterdam (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 16:40:38 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 11:55:38 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 16:59:43 CET)
Re: NULLs JOG (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 16:00:47 CET)
Re: NULLs Marshall (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 19:34:06 CET)
Re: NULLs JOG (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 19:40:33 CET)
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour (Sat Dec 29 2007 - 19:54:14 CET)
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99 (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 09:27:11 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 16:03:27 CET)
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99 (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 18:09:08 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 18:24:42 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? rpl (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 19:02:14 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? mAsterdam (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 20:19:46 CET)
Re: NULLs Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 20:23:20 CET)
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Marshall (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 20:45:44 CET)
Re: NULLs JOG (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 21:09:52 CET)
Re: NULLs David Cressey (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 23:42:12 CET)
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 01:49:41 CET)
  - some ado about nothing mAsterdam (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 02:29:44 CET)
Re: NULLs Brian Selzer (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 23:46:59 CET)
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99 (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 23:56:06 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? mAsterdam (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 01:18:58 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 01:51:44 CET)
Re: NULLs JOG (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 00:23:18 CET)
- Re: NULLs Bob Badour (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 01:46:26 CET)
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? JOG (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 03:22:06 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 04:50:22 CET)
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? JOG (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 05:15:16 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 15:15:29 CET)
Re: Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? David BL (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 06:09:36 CET)
M`I 5-Per secution - Molestation durin g Trav el viemvmvfi_at_hotmail.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 09:23:40 CET)
Re: NULLs Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 09:32:05 CET)
M,I-5 Pe rsecution ' MI 5 a re Afr aid to Adm it Theyr e Be hind th e Persecut ion mivmevie_at_yahoo.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 09:44:36 CET)
Re: NULLs Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 10:01:45 CET)
Re: NULLs JOG (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 14:33:35 CET)
Re: NULLs Brian Selzer (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 15:51:35 CET)
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? raylopez99 (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 19:08:52 CET)
Re: NULLs Marshall (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 19:49:20 CET)
Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:03:18 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:08:17 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David Cressey (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:28:38 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 15:03:13 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships rpost (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 17:52:47 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 17:58:35 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 18:21:09 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships David BL (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 18:56:23 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 19:56:35 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 20:06:20 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 20:13:06 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 20:14:09 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships JOG (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 20:26:20 CET)
- Re: One-To-One Relationships Cimode (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 20:27:13 CET)
  - Re: One-To-One Relationships Marshall (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 23:20:29 CET)
    - Re: One-To-One Relationships Bob Badour (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 23:37:17 CET)
MI5 Persecution: How to Identify the Persecutors (2008) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:28:36 CET)
MI5 Persecution: Browse the Website (3479) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:58:19 CET)
MI5 Persecution: Comparing the MI5 Persecution with German Final Solution (4950) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 13:12:49 CET)
MI5 Persecution: MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign (6421) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 13:35:37 CET)
MI5 Persecution: Four Years of MI5 Persecution Posts on Internet Newsgroups (7892) MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sat Dec 01 2007 - 13:56:03 CET)
Re: RM formalism supporting partial information Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 13:22:24 CET)
plz normalize this table for me M.Shariq (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 14:15:29 CET)
- Re: plz normalize this table for me Jan Hidders (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 15:11:37 CET)
  - Re: plz normalize this table for me Bob Badour (Sun Dec 02 2007 - 16:49:16 CET)
Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 00:01:22 CET)
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 00:38:49 CET)
Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 00:51:47 CET)
Re: Help with Ms-Access David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 15:29:04 CET)
Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 01:07:36 CET)
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 01:23:44 CET)
Re: Help with Ms-Access David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 01:10:20 CET)
Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 01:19:43 CET)
Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 01:37:45 CET)
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 02:24:14 CET)
Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 03:50:59 CET)
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 04:47:07 CET)
Re: Help with Ms-Access Jeffrey Davis (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 05:20:17 CET)
- Re: Help with Ms-Access Bob Badour (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 14:55:36 CET)
What is analysis? David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 01:23:52 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? Marshall (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 08:40:01 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? Jon Heggland (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 09:42:11 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? JOG (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 22:51:09 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 14:13:31 CET)
  - Re: What is analysis? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 15:04:05 CET)
  - Re: What is analysis? Jon Heggland (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 15:43:24 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 15:15:26 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 15:37:54 CET)
- Re: What is analysis? David Cressey (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 17:11:15 CET)
  - Re: What is analysis? Bob Badour (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 17:30:38 CET)
  - Re: What is analysis? Jon Heggland (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 19:43:08 CET)
Character string relation and functional dependencies Tegiri Nenashi (Mon Dec 03 2007 - 20:16:55 CET)
Re: Another view on analysis and ER JOG (Tue Dec 04 2007 - 21:04:31 CET)
indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search xareon_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 16:47:37 CET)
- Re: indexes vs sorted files in range and equality search xareon_at_gmail.com (Thu Dec 06 2007 - 17:45:26 CET)
Call for speakers - SQL Bits 2008; 1st March 2008 Birmingham UK Tony Rogerson (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 16:04:45 CET)
Valentina 3.5 Now Offers Custom Server Properties Lynn (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 23:41:54 CET)
- Re: Valentina 3.5 Now Offers Custom Server Properties Bob Badour (Fri Dec 07 2007 - 23:57:06 CET)
Query independency from updates problem for relational databases silentser_at_gmail.com (Mon Dec 10 2007 - 20:26:50 CET)
Anyone remember this book? Evan Keel (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 00:29:34 CET)
- Re: Anyone remember this book? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 01:00:27 CET)
- Re: Anyone remember this book? Roy Hann (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 11:01:54 CET)
CSR 2008: Last Call for Papers - deadline extended! (Moscow, Jun 08) Yuri Pritykin (Tue Dec 11 2007 - 00:34:09 CET)
Newbie question about db normalization theory: redundant keys OK? raylopez99 (Wed Dec 12 2007 - 23:26:36 CET)
Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) d-42 (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 06:30:48 CET)
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) David Cressey (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 12:51:14 CET)
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) David Cressey (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 12:54:55 CET)
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) Bob Badour (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 18:25:05 CET)
- Re: Multiple Parent Tables (or Multiple Inheritence, or Arc-Relationships...) jefftyzzer (Thu Dec 13 2007 - 20:50:09 CET)
Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 12:24:06 CET)
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Kira Yamato (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 12:42:47 CET)
  - Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Knowledgy (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:06:39 CET)
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. Ross Presser (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 18:34:27 CET)
- Re: Help needed on Boyce-Codd Normal Form. TroyK (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 23:08:02 CET)
Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? raylopez99 (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 21:59:02 CET)
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? David Portas (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:40:24 CET)
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? mAsterdam (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:45:42 CET)
- Re: Access as a RDBMS--why the multiple relationships? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 14 2007 - 22:46:47 CET)
Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? raylopez99 (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 17:37:16 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Jerry Gitomer (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 18:14:55 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 18:16:44 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Roy Hann (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 18:17:43 CET)
- Re: Trend towards artificial keys (GUIDs) sez my textbook...is AI next? Hugo Kornelis (Sat Dec 15 2007 - 23:30:38 CET)
MI5-Persecution: How Could It Be True? (504) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 11:43:29 CET)
MI5-Persecution: Why do you think MI5 are responsible? (2687) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 12:42:40 CET)
- MI5-Persecution: How to Identify the Persecutors (11419) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 14:27:22 CET)
MI5-Persecution: Why would they be doing this to you, sir? (4870) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 13:12:27 CET)
MI5-Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website (7053) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 13:39:24 CET)
MI5-Persecution: BBC Newscasters Spying on my Home (9236) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 14:04:24 CET)
MI5-Persecution: Browse the Website (13602) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 14:54:20 CET)
- MI5-Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny Theyre Watching Me (22334) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 16:47:59 CET)
  - MI5-Persecution: MI5 are Afraid to Admit Theyre Behind the Persecution (26700) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 17:49:29 CET)
MI5-Persecution: Comparing the MI5 Persecution with German Final Solution (15785) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 15:21:27 CET)
MI5-Persecution: MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign (17968) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 15:50:27 CET)
MI5-Persecution: Four Years of MI5 Persecution Posts on Internet Newsgroups (20151) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 16:18:31 CET)
MI5-Persecution: Molestation during Travel (24517) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 17:17:34 CET)
MI5-Persecution: No Justice for the Victims of MI5 (28883) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 18:17:02 CET)
MI5-Persecution: MI5 Have Systematically Destroyed My Life (31066) MI5-Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk (Sun Dec 16 2007 - 18:53:50 CET)
Deadline approaching: Call for book chapters - Proposal Submission Deadline: Dec 31, 2007 Yanchang (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 03:52:11 CET)
Amazon's "Simple" Database JOG (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 12:34:40 CET)
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database David Cressey (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 12:52:40 CET)
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Bob Badour (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 12:53:41 CET)
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Roy Hann (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 13:12:15 CET)
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database JOG (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 13:55:47 CET)
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database David Cressey (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 15:03:57 CET)
- Re: Amazon's "Simple" Database Tegiri Nenashi (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 18:33:07 CET)
What is a "data sublanguage" David Cressey (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 17:19:57 CET)
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Kira Yamato (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 18:03:38 CET)
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Bob Badour (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 22:35:46 CET)
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Roy Hann (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 19:20:33 CET)
- Re: What is a "data sublanguage" Kira Yamato (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 20:47:15 CET)
Wanna be a DBA? David Cressey (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 20:31:06 CET)
- Re: Wanna be a DBA? Jason Lepack (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 22:57:10 CET)
- Re: Wanna be a DBA? Bob Badour (Tue Dec 18 2007 - 23:09:05 CET)
Implementing Dataphor Providers in Visual Studio - Help! stevedtrm_at_hotmail.com (Wed Dec 19 2007 - 21:38:57 CET)
which part of IM is this ? rpl (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 03:33:04 CET)
- Re: which part of IM is this ? Bob Badour (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 03:49:35 CET)
  - Re: which part of IM is this ? rpl (Thu Dec 20 2007 - 05:41:13 CET)
A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? raylopez99 (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 19:44:36 CET)
- Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? David Portas (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 20:33:25 CET)
  - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Douglas J. Steele (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 21:51:57 CET)
    - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 23:37:47 CET)
  - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 22:38:20 CET)
    - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? tina (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 20:57:23 CET)
      - Re: A newbie paradox: is this a PK-FK (relationship) problem, or programming problem? Bob Badour (Sat Dec 22 2007 - 21:21:19 CET)
schema help magawake (Tue Dec 25 2007 - 20:37:47 CET)
- Re: schema help Rob (Tue Dec 25 2007 - 23:40:08 CET)
M'I-5'Per secution Comparin g t he MI5 Persecut ion wit h German Fina l Soluti on mevfm_at_hotmail.com (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 09:33:18 CET)
M`I'5-Perse cution ` M I5 W aste Taxp ayer M illions on Poi ntless Hate-Campaign ifmvem_at_hotmail.com (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 09:45:09 CET)
M,I.5'P ersecution Fou r Years of M I5 Persec ution Po sts on Inte rnet Newsgro ups vmemfvm_at_hotmail.com (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 10:00:18 CET)
M-I,5.Persecu tion - BB C Newsca sters Lie & Den y Theyre W atching Me fvfefv_at_hotmail.com (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 10:16:32 CET)
M I`5 Persecuti on , Molestation during T ravel mfifefemi_at_hotmail.com (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 10:30:22 CET)
NULLs stevedtrm (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 18:10:13 CET)
- Re: NULLs David Cressey (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 18:47:21 CET)
  - Re: NULLs Bob Badour (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 21:00:07 CET)
    - Re: NULLs Bob Badour (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 21:09:41 CET)
SAP BASIS Tech Cons, Lionsville PA, 3-4 months ...URGENT REQUIREMENT... META SENSE SUPPORT (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 18:28:00 CET)
A few questions about arxiv paper Tegiri Nenashi (Wed Dec 26 2007 - 22:54:25 CET)
creating ER diagrams magawake (Thu Dec 27 2007 - 05:20:21 CET)
What is an automorphism of a database instance? Kira Yamato (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 06:15:49 CET)
- Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance? Kira Yamato (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 07:13:34 CET)
- Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance? Tegiri Nenashi (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 19:07:54 CET)
  - Re: What is an automorphism of a database instance? Bob Badour (Fri Dec 28 2007 - 22:35:28 CET)
Functional Dependency algorithm Jeff (Sun Dec 30 2007 - 01:02:30 CET)
M`I'5-Perse cution ` No J ustice f or the Vi ctims of M I5 eifmv_at_lycos.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 10:03:52 CET)
M'I-5'Perse cution , MI5 Have Syste matically Destr oyed My Lif e vefvfmfv_at_bigfoot.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 10:26:29 CET)
- M`I,5`Pers ecution - Harass ment throu gh the Rad io fvfmev_at_gmail.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 10:50:03 CET)
M`I 5.Persecution ` Three Years of MI 5 Persecut ion Faxe s mvmvfim_at_hotmail.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 11:16:07 CET)
M.I,5`Persecu tion . MI5 Wan t Me to Send Yo u the se Faxes evmfe_at_yahoo.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 11:54:44 CET)
Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 11:58:12 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 17:19:45 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 18:01:13 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? Tony Toews [MVP] (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 20:13:09 CET)
- Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically? David Cressey (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 20:31:36 CET)
M`I 5.Persecutio n ` MI 5 Insis t th at the se Faxes m ust Contin ue mimie_at_lycos.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 12:41:59 CET)
M'I`5'Persec ution 2 2,544 + 83 7 = 23, 381 evfefivm_at_bigfoot.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 13:05:45 CET)
What Is Linux? Andrew.Skipper.group.com_at_gmail.com (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 16:11:27 CET)
Scholarships for PhD study in Informatics_at_Edinburgh Don Sannella (Mon Dec 31 2007 - 16:30:21 CET)

Last message date: Mon Dec 31 2007 - 20:31:36 CET
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 22:50:24 CEST

709 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]