Re: A philosophical newbie issue: catch redundant errors via relationships or programmically?

From: JOG <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:22:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <94c974e9-496d-4ddf-8a53-0a094fa7b3c2_at_l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com>


On Dec 31, 12:51 am, Bob Badour <bbad..._at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> raylopez99 wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 2:19 pm, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
>
> >>raylopez99 wrote:
>
> >>>OK wise guy <g>, I kindly beseech thee to give me a simple schema that
> >>>will do the following: "to declare a uniqueness constraint as a
> >>>foreign key reference" that allows me to do the following:
>
> >>Where did you get the quoted part? It is unclear.
>
> > I think that was Bob's quote, but even he didn't recognize it, so I
> > misunderstood.
>
> When Bob pointed out you seemed to be trying to use a foreign key
> reference for a uniqueness constraint, Bob's point was uniqueness
> constraints are not foreign key references. You need to use a uniqueness
> constraint instead.

Jim thinks that referring to oneself in third person is the first sign of madness. Or is it hairy palms? I can never remember.... Received on Mon Dec 31 2007 - 03:22:06 CET

Original text of this message