Re: Another view on analysis and ER
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:34:29 +0100
Message-ID: <475a0f61$0$226$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
> This reminds me of the Monty Python brain surgeon episode, "yes I'm the
> brain surgeon", "no, I'm not the brain surgeon". I think you are just
> fooling around, that would be okay if you admitted it. If you are
> serious, as I said before, "God help us!".
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:34:29 +0100
Message-ID: <475a0f61$0$226$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
paul c schreef:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>> paul c schreef: >>> mAsterdam wrote: >>>> You made a claim. The mysticism itself is yours - not what you >>>> perceive as the explosion of it. >>> The claim was that a relation doesn't have two different headers. >> >> No. Your claim was: >> >> "...the RM already is language-neutral..."
>
> This reminds me of the Monty Python brain surgeon episode, "yes I'm the
> brain surgeon", "no, I'm not the brain surgeon". I think you are just
> fooling around, that would be okay if you admitted it. If you are
> serious, as I said before, "God help us!".
Nice duck. Are you holding up the claim or are you letting it go? Received on Sat Dec 08 2007 - 04:34:29 CET